- Han, Ying;
- Hazelett, Dennis J;
- Wiklund, Fredrik;
- Schumacher, Fredrick R;
- Stram, Daniel O;
- Berndt, Sonja I;
- Wang, Zhaoming;
- Rand, Kristin A;
- Hoover, Robert N;
- Machiela, Mitchell J;
- Yeager, Merideth;
- Burdette, Laurie;
- Chung, Charles C;
- Hutchinson, Amy;
- Yu, Kai;
- Xu, Jianfeng;
- Travis, Ruth C;
- Key, Timothy J;
- Siddiq, Afshan;
- Canzian, Federico;
- Takahashi, Atsushi;
- Kubo, Michiaki;
- Stanford, Janet L;
- Kolb, Suzanne;
- Gapstur, Susan M;
- Diver, W Ryan;
- Stevens, Victoria L;
- Strom, Sara S;
- Pettaway, Curtis A;
- Olama, Ali Amin Al;
- Kote-Jarai, Zsofia;
- Eeles, Rosalind A;
- Yeboah, Edward D;
- Tettey, Yao;
- Biritwum, Richard B;
- Adjei, Andrew A;
- Tay, Evelyn;
- Truelove, Ann;
- Niwa, Shelley;
- Chokkalingam, Anand P;
- Isaacs, William B;
- Chen, Constance;
- Lindstrom, Sara;
- Le Marchand, Loic;
- Giovannucci, Edward L;
- Pomerantz, Mark;
- Long, Henry;
- Li, Fugen;
- Ma, Jing;
- Stampfer, Meir;
- John, Esther M;
- Ingles, Sue A;
- Kittles, Rick A;
- Murphy, Adam B;
- Blot, William J;
- Signorello, Lisa B;
- Zheng, Wei;
- Albanes, Demetrius;
- Virtamo, Jarmo;
- Weinstein, Stephanie;
- Nemesure, Barbara;
- Carpten, John;
- Leske, M Cristina;
- Wu, Suh-Yuh;
- Hennis, Anselm JM;
- Rybicki, Benjamin A;
- Neslund-Dudas, Christine;
- Hsing, Ann W;
- Chu, Lisa;
- Goodman, Phyllis J;
- Klein, Eric A;
- Zheng, S Lilly;
- Witte, John S;
- Casey, Graham;
- Riboli, Elio;
- Li, Qiyuan;
- Freedman, Matthew L;
- Hunter, David J;
- Gronberg, Henrik;
- Cook, Michael B;
- Nakagawa, Hidewaki;
- Kraft, Peter;
- Chanock, Stephen J;
- Easton, Douglas F;
- Henderson, Brian E;
- Coetzee, Gerhard A;
- Conti, David V;
- Haiman, Christopher A
Interpretation of biological mechanisms underlying genetic risk associations for prostate cancer is complicated by the relatively large number of risk variants (n = 100) and the thousands of surrogate SNPs in linkage disequilibrium. Here, we combined three distinct approaches: multiethnic fine-mapping, putative functional annotation (based upon epigenetic data and genome-encoded features), and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses, in an attempt to reduce this complexity. We examined 67 risk regions using genotyping and imputation-based fine-mapping in populations of European (cases/controls: 8600/6946), African (cases/controls: 5327/5136), Japanese (cases/controls: 2563/4391) and Latino (cases/controls: 1034/1046) ancestry. Markers at 55 regions passed a region-specific significance threshold (P-value cutoff range: 3.9 × 10(-4)-5.6 × 10(-3)) and in 30 regions we identified markers that were more significantly associated with risk than the previously reported variants in the multiethnic sample. Novel secondary signals (P < 5.0 × 10(-6)) were also detected in two regions (rs13062436/3q21 and rs17181170/3p12). Among 666 variants in the 55 regions with P-values within one order of magnitude of the most-associated marker, 193 variants (29%) in 48 regions overlapped with epigenetic or other putative functional marks. In 11 of the 55 regions, cis-eQTLs were detected with nearby genes. For 12 of the 55 regions (22%), the most significant region-specific, prostate-cancer associated variant represented the strongest candidate functional variant based on our annotations; the number of regions increased to 20 (36%) and 27 (49%) when examining the 2 and 3 most significantly associated variants in each region, respectively. These results have prioritized subsets of candidate variants for downstream functional evaluation.