Editorial decisions are made on the base of scholarly merit, clarity, and the journal’s mission of advancing undergraduate economic research. We do not discriminate on the basis of identity, institution, or background. In line with this mission, while the Head of Peer Review may access identifying information for administration, all other reviewers evaluate manuscripts without knowledge of author identities. We have a strict policy against plagiarism and require that all sources (including the use of AI tools) be cited appropriately. To ensure fair evaluation, authors and reviewers must disclose conflicts of interests, and any reviewer with such a conflict will recuse themselves from the review process of that manuscript.

The views published in this journal are those of the individual authors or speakers and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of Berkeley Economic Review staff, the UC Berkeley Economics Department and faculty, or the University of California, Berkeley in general.