Behavior
Parent: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63k9r489 | Behavior-Based Energy Efficiency: A Case Study of the Oakland EcoBlock Final Project Report | 117 | 25 | 92 | 21.4% |
| 89s3b4dg | Teenagers as Energy Conservation Stewards: The Dial Down Challenge | 51 | 8 | 43 | 15.7% |
| 4kq8q8d6 | Behavioral Assumptions in Energy Efficiency Potential Studies | 43 | 17 | 26 | 39.5% |
| 45w3k7bz | Behavioral Assumptions Underlying California Residential Sector Energy Efficiency Programs | 40 | 13 | 27 | 32.5% |
| 9779d0tj | Using Experiments to Foster Innovation and Improve the Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs | 38 | 7 | 31 | 18.4% |
| 78h4380g | Market Segmentation and Energy Efficiency Program Design | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% |
| 7sg996s9 | Process Evaluation Insights on Program Implementation | 28 | 6 | 22 | 21.4% |
| 0926w85z | A Review of Energy Reduction Competitions: What Have We Learned? | 27 | 10 | 17 | 37.0% |
| 7h18g009 | Pursuing Energy-Efficient Behavior in a Regulatory Environment: Motivating Policymakers, Program Administrators, and Program Implementers | 24 | 9 | 15 | 37.5% |
| 5m081406 | Lessons Learned and Next Steps in Energy Efficiency Measurement and Attribution: Energy Savings, Net to Gross, Non-Energy Benefits, and Persistence of Energy Efficiency Behavior | 23 | 11 | 12 | 47.8% |
| 0w59p1np | Behavioral Assumptions Underlying Energy Efficiency Programs for Businesses | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% |
| 0231w1cx | Behavior and Energy White Papers: Use of Papers and Next Steps | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% |
| 5cx9g8t5 | The Climate Imperative and Innovative Behavior: Encouraging Greater Advances in the Production of Energy-Efficient Technologies and Services | 17 | 8 | 9 | 47.1% |
| 6zc6270h | Market Structure and Energy Efficiency: The Case of New Commercial Buildings | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% |
| 7n40522n | Market Structure and Energy Efficiency: The Case of New Commercial Buildings | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% |
| 3xf5m51z | Using Experiments to Foster Innovation and Improve the Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs (presentation) | 16 | 5 | 11 | 31.3% |
| 83x1d750 | Peak Demand Impacts of ResidentialAir-Conditioning Conservation Measures | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% |
| 7rk6m93r | A Review of Energy Reduction Competitions: What Have We Learned? (Fact Sheet) | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.