Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Do Sanitation Improvements Reduce Fecal Contamination of Water, Hands, Food, Soil, and Flies? Evidence from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh.

  • Author(s): Ercumen, Ayse
  • Pickering, Amy J
  • Kwong, Laura H
  • Mertens, Andrew
  • Arnold, Benjamin F
  • Benjamin-Chung, Jade
  • Hubbard, Alan E
  • Alam, Mahfuja
  • Sen, Debashis
  • Islam, Sharmin
  • Rahman, Md Zahidur
  • Kullmann, Craig
  • Chase, Claire
  • Ahmed, Rokeya
  • Parvez, Sarker Masud
  • Unicomb, Leanne
  • Rahman, Mahbubur
  • Ram, Pavani K
  • Clasen, Thomas
  • Luby, Stephen P
  • Colford, John M
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222553/
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Sanitation improvements have had limited effectiveness in reducing the spread of fecal pathogens into the environment. We conducted environmental measurements within a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh that implemented individual and combined water treatment, sanitation, handwashing (WSH) and nutrition interventions (WASH Benefits, NCT01590095). Following approximately 4 months of intervention, we enrolled households in the trial's control, sanitation and combined WSH arms to assess whether sanitation improvements, alone and coupled with water treatment and handwashing, reduce fecal contamination in the domestic environment. We quantified fecal indicator bacteria in samples of drinking and ambient waters, child hands, food given to young children, courtyard soil and flies. In the WSH arm, Escherichia coli prevalence in stored drinking water was reduced by 62% (prevalence ratio = 0.38 (0.32, 0.44)) and E. coli concentration by 1-log (Δlog10 = -0.88 (-1.01, -0.75)). The interventions did not reduce E. coli along other sampled pathways. Ambient contamination remained high among intervention households. Potential reasons include noncommunity-level sanitation coverage, child open defecation, animal fecal sources, or naturalized E. coli in the environment. Future studies should explore potential threshold effects of different levels of community sanitation coverage on environmental contamination.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item