Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC San Diego

UC San Diego Previously Published Works bannerUC San Diego

Hepatic R2* is more strongly associated with proton density fat fraction than histologic liver iron scores in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Published Web Location

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmri.26312
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Background

The liver R2* value is widely used as a measure of liver iron but may be confounded by the presence of hepatic steatosis and other covariates.

Purpose

To identify the most influential covariates for liver R2* values in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Study type

Retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data.

Population

Baseline data from 204 subjects enrolled in NAFLD/NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) treatment trials.

Field strength

1.5T and 3T; chemical-shift encoded multiecho gradient echo.

Assessment

Correlation between liver proton density fat fraction and R2*; assessment for demographic, metabolic, laboratory, MRI-derived, and histological covariates of liver R2*.

Statistical tests

Pearson's and Spearman's correlations; univariate analysis; gradient boosting machines (GBM) multivariable machine-learning method.

Results

Hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was the most strongly correlated covariate for R2* at both 1.5T (r = 0.652, P < 0.0001) and at 3T (r = 0.586, P < 0.0001). In the GBM analysis, hepatic PDFF was the most influential covariate for hepatic R2*, with relative influences (RIs) of 61.3% at 1.5T and 47.5% at 3T; less influential covariates had RIs of up to 11.5% at 1.5T and 16.7% at 3T. Nonhepatocellular iron was weakly associated with R2* at 3T only (RI 6.7%), and hepatocellular iron was not associated with R2* at either field strength.

Data conclusion

Hepatic PDFF is the most influential covariate for R2* at both 1.5T and 3T; nonhepatocellular iron deposition is weakly associated with liver R2* at 3T only.

Level of evidence

4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1456-1466.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item