Skip to main content
Addressing population health and health inequalities: the role of fundamental causes.
Published Web Locationhttp://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302055
No data is associated with this publication.
ObjectivesAs a case study of the impact of universal versus targeted interventions on population health and health inequalities, we used simulations to examine (1) whether universal or targeted manipulations of collective efficacy better reduced population-level rates and racial/ethnic inequalities in violent victimization; and (2) whether experiments reduced disparities without addressing fundamental causes.
MethodsWe applied agent-based simulation techniques to the specific example of an intervention on neighborhood collective efficacy to reduce population-level rates and racial/ethnic inequalities in violent victimization. The agent population consisted of 4000 individuals aged 18 years and older with sociodemographic characteristics assigned to match distributions of the adult population in New York City according to the 2000 U.S. Census.
ResultsUniversal experiments reduced rates of victimization more than targeted experiments. However, neither experiment reduced inequalities. To reduce inequalities, it was necessary to eliminate racial/ethnic residential segregation.
ConclusionsThese simulations support the use of universal intervention but suggest that it is not possible to address inequalities in health without first addressing fundamental causes.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Item not freely available? Link broken?Report a problem accessing this item