Berkeley Scientific Journal

The immense plant diversity that is characteristic of tropical rain forests often makes it difficult for ecological and conservation studies to identify individual plant species and measure biodiversity. DNA barcoding is a species identification technique that utilizes standard, short dnA sequences to distinguish between species when traditional taxonomic identification is not practical. Accurate identification of animals with DNA barcoding has been well established, but a universally accepted DNA barcode for plants still does not exist. The use of nuclear DNA markers and plastid DNA markers from the chloroplast are the two contending approaches to DNA barcoding. This study compares the utility of the nuclear DNA marker ItS and the plastid DNA marker rbcL as DNA barcodes among 35 Burseraceae tree species from the Peruvian Amazon. I found that the proposed DNA barcode rbcL greatly underperformed the nuclear marker ItS as a DNA barcode. While both markers exhibited greater than 90% amplification success ItS demonstrated a mean pairwise percentage sequence divergence of 5.4% while rbcL demonstrated 0.83%. Additionally, at 1% sequence divergence resolution ItS discriminated between 99% of species-pairs while rbcL only discriminated between 26%. The results of my study suggest that ItS should not be completely discounted from the plant DNA barcode debate and rbcL be reevaluated as a proposed universal barcode.