Skip to main content
Species richness and endemism in the native flora of California.
- Author(s): Baldwin, Bruce G
- Thornhill, Andrew H
- Freyman, William A
- Ackerly, David D
- Kling, Matthew M
- Morueta-Holme, Naia
- Mishler, Brent D
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3732/ajb.1600326
No data is associated with this publication.
Premise of the studyCalifornia's vascular flora is the most diverse and threatened in temperate North America. Previous studies of spatial patterns of Californian plant diversity have been limited by traditional metrics, non-uniform geographic units, and distributional data derived from floristic descriptions for only a subset of species.
MethodsWe revisited patterns of sampling intensity, species richness, and relative endemism in California based on equal-area spatial units, the full vascular flora, and specimen-based distributional data. We estimated richness, weighted endemism (inverse range-weighting of species), and corrected weighted endemism (weighted endemism corrected for richness), and performed a randomization test for significantly high endemism.
Key resultsPossible biases in herbarium data do not obscure patterns of high richness and endemism at the spatial resolution studied. High species richness was sometimes associated with significantly high endemism (e.g., Klamath Ranges) but often not. In Stebbins and Major's (1965) main endemism hotspot, Southwestern California, species richness is high across much of the Peninsular and Transverse ranges but significantly high endemism is mostly localized to the Santa Rosa and San Bernardino mountains. In contrast, species richness is low in the Channel Islands, where endemism is significantly high, as also found for much of the Death Valley region.
ConclusionsMeasures of taxonomic richness, even with greater weighting of range-restricted taxa, are insufficient for identifying areas of significantly high endemism that warrant conservation attention. Differences between our findings and those in previous studies appear to mostly reflect the source and scale of distributional data, and recent analytical refinements.
Item not freely available? Link broken?Report a problem accessing this item