Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Human Complex Systems

UCLA

ANSWER TO COMMENTS BY DOUGLAS WHITE, DWIGHT READ AND F. K. LEHMAN

Abstract

The goal in constructing this artificial language is not to construct a grammar for a subset of natural languages. In other words, the artificial language of kin terms built by means of symbols B, Z, F, M, S and D is not intended as a grammar that would generate strings having syntactical or phonetic similitude with strings in any natural language, even in the restricted domain of kinship. This would have been a linguistic problem, not a problem in cultural theory. The formal language K* is a means to construct a genealogical space endowed with a very simple structure. The basic hypothesis is that kinship terminologies in natural languages are distinguished in the way they classify the paths in the genealogical space. To describe these actually existing classifications is a task of empirical research. The task of the theory is to construct a theoretically-based classification of the genealogical space that should reproduce the empirically given classification, or some relevant feature of it.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View