Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC San Diego

UC San Diego Previously Published Works bannerUC San Diego

The responsiveness and minimally important difference for the Accidental Bowel Leakage Evaluation questionnaire.

  • Author(s): Rogers, Rebecca G
  • Bann, Carla M
  • Barber, Matthew D
  • Fairchild, Pamela
  • Lukacz, Emily S
  • Arya, Lily
  • Markland, Alayne D
  • Siddiqui, Nazema Y
  • Sung, Vivian W
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00192-020-04367-5
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We describe the responsiveness and minimally important difference (MID) of the Accidental Bowel Leakage Evaluation (ABLE) questionnaire.

Methods

Women with bowel leakage completed ABLE, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Colo-Rectal Anal Distress Inventory, and Vaizey questionnaires pretreatment and again at 24 weeks post-treatment. Change scores were correlated between questionnaires. Student's t tests compared ABLE change scores for improved versus not improved based on other measures. The MID was determined by anchor- and distribution-based approaches.

Results

In 266 women, the mean age was 63.75 (SD = 11.14) and 79% were white. Mean baseline ABLE scores were 2.32 ± 0.56 (possible range 1-5) with a reduction of 0.62 (SD = 0.79) by 24 weeks. ABLE change scores correlated with related measures change scores (r = 0.24 to 0.53) and differed between women who improved and did not improve (all p < 0.001). Standardized response means for participants who improved were large ranging from -0.89 to -1.12. Distribution-based methods suggest a MID of -0.19 based on the criterion of one SEM and -0.28 based on half a standard deviation. Anchor-based MIDs ranged from -0.10 to -0.45. We recommend a MID of -0.20.

Conclusions

The ABLE questionnaire is responsive to change, with a suggested MID of -0.20.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item