Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Carbon and energy fluxes in cropland ecosystems: a model-data comparison

  • Author(s): Lokupitiya, E
  • Denning, AS
  • Schaefer, K
  • Ricciuto, D
  • Anderson, R
  • Arain, MA
  • Baker, I
  • Barr, AG
  • Chen, G
  • Chen, JM
  • Ciais, P
  • Cook, DR
  • Dietze, M
  • El Maayar, M
  • Fischer, M
  • Grant, R
  • Hollinger, D
  • Izaurralde, C
  • Jain, A
  • Kucharik, C
  • Li, Z
  • Liu, S
  • Li, L
  • Matamala, R
  • Peylin, P
  • Price, D
  • Running, SW
  • Sahoo, A
  • Sprintsin, M
  • Suyker, AE
  • Tian, H
  • Tonitto, C
  • Torn, M
  • Verbeeck, H
  • Verma, SB
  • Xue, Y
  • et al.
Abstract

© 2016, Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Croplands are highly productive ecosystems that contribute to land–atmosphere exchange of carbon, energy, and water during their short growing seasons. We evaluated and compared net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent heat flux (LE), and sensible heat flux (H) simulated by a suite of ecosystem models at five agricultural eddy covariance flux tower sites in the central United States as part of the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis project. Most of the models overestimated H and underestimated LE during the growing season, leading to overall higher Bowen ratios compared to the observations. Most models systematically under predicted NEE, especially at rain-fed sites. Certain crop-specific models that were developed considering the high productivity and associated physiological changes in specific crops better predicted the NEE and LE at both rain-fed and irrigated sites. Models with specific parameterization for different crops better simulated the inter-annual variability of NEE for maize-soybean rotation compared to those models with a single generic crop type. Stratification according to basic model formulation and phenological methodology did not explain significant variation in model performance across these sites and crops. The under prediction of NEE and LE and over prediction of H by most of the models suggests that models developed and parameterized for natural ecosystems cannot accurately predict the more robust physiology of highly bred and intensively managed crop ecosystems. When coupled in Earth System Models, it is likely that the excessive physiological stress simulated in many land surface component models leads to overestimation of temperature and atmospheric boundary layer depth, and underestimation of humidity and CO2seasonal uptake over agricultural regions.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
Current View