- Main
Deviations from Rational Expectations and Asset Prices
- Mokanov, Denis
- Advisor(s): Lochstoer, Lars A
Abstract
In Chapter 1, I document a novel result regarding the uncovered interest rate parity (UIP) puzzle: investing in high interest rate currencies does not yield positive excess returns during recessions. That is, the UIP holds in bad times. This new finding is a challenge to existing rational expectations models that address the UIP puzzle. A model featuring investors whose interest rate expectations are distorted by extrapolation bias and time-varying stickiness is able to quantitatively account for this evidence when calibrated to available survey data. The model also generates predictions for bond return predictability, the profitability of time-series momentum in the foreign exchange and fixed income markets, and foreign exchange predictability during the post-2007 period, which are borne out in the data.
In Chapter 2 (with Gabriel Cuevas Rodriguez and Danyu Zhang), we document three stylized facts related to equity analysts' earnings expectations: (1) consensus earnings expectations underreact to news unconditionally, (2) the degree of underreaction declines during high-volatility periods, and (3) the degree of underreaction declines over our sample. To account for these findings, we develop a simple model featuring rational inattention. We show that our model is able to account for the unconditional profitability of momentum, momentum crashes, and the diminishing profitability of momentum over our sample. Based on the predictions of our model, we propose a trading strategy that mixes short-run and long-run momentum signals and show that the resultant mixed momentum strategy outperforms conventional long-run momentum strategies. Finally, we use a machine learning algorithm to estimate the predictable component of earnings surprises and construct a portfolio that is long (short) on stocks with excessively pessimistic (optimistic) earnings expectations. The resultant trading strategy generates an annualized Sharpe ratio of about 1.16 and its returns are not explained by popular factor models.
Main Content
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-