Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Comparison of fracture risk assessment tools in older men without prior hip or spine fracture: the MrOS study.

  • Author(s): Gourlay, Margaret L
  • Ritter, Victor S
  • Fine, Jason P
  • Overman, Robert A
  • Schousboe, John T
  • Cawthon, Peggy M
  • Orwoll, Eric S
  • Nguyen, Tuan V
  • Lane, Nancy E
  • Cummings, Steven R
  • Kado, Deborah M
  • Lapidus, Jodi A
  • Diem, Susan J
  • Ensrud, Kristine E
  • Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11657-017-0389-1
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), age plus femoral neck BMD T score, and three externally generated fracture risk tools had similar accuracy to identify older men who developed osteoporotic fractures. Risk tools with femoral neck BMD performed better than those without BMD. The externally developed risk tools were poorly calibrated. INTRODUCTION:We compared the performance of fracture risk assessment tools in older men, accounting for competing risks including mortality. METHODS:A comparative ROC curve analysis assessed the ability of the QFracture, FRAX® and Garvan fracture risk tools, and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T score with or without age to identify incident fracture in community-dwelling men aged 65 years or older (N = 4994) without hip or clinical vertebral fracture or antifracture treatment at baseline. RESULTS:Among risk tools calculated with BMD, the discriminative ability to identify men with incident hip fracture was similar for FRAX (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.73, 0.81), the Garvan tool (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.74, 0.82), age plus femoral neck BMD T score (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.75, 0.83), and femoral neck BMD T score alone (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72, 0.81). Among risk tools calculated without BMD, the discriminative ability to identify hip fracture was similar for QFracture (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.66, 0.73), FRAX (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.66, 0.73), and the Garvan tool (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.67, 0.74). Correlated ROC curve analyses revealed better diagnostic accuracy for risk scores calculated with BMD compared with QFracture (P < 0.0001). Calibration was good for the internally generated BMD T score predictor with or without age and poor for the externally developed risk tools. CONCLUSION:In untreated older men without fragility fractures at baseline, an age plus femoral neck BMD T score classifier identified men with incident hip fracture as accurately as more complicated fracture risk scores.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item