Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Disability Law Journal

UCLA

Key Disability Rights Regulations Will Remain Authoritative in the Wake of Loper Bright: A Toolkit for Litigation

Abstract

This essay will explain why the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo—overruling the deference afforded regulatory interpretation in the Court’s well-established decision in Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council—should not threaten a core of longstanding disability rights regulations. My goal is to provide a useful resource for litigators facing arguments challenging those regulations in the wake of Loper Bright.