Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC San Diego

UC San Diego Previously Published Works bannerUC San Diego

No Increase in Fractures After Stopping Hormone Therapy: Results From the Women's Health Initiative.

  • Author(s): Watts, Nelson B
  • Cauley, Jane A
  • Jackson, Rebecca D
  • LaCroix, Andrea Z
  • Lewis, Cora E
  • Manson, JoAnn E
  • Neuner, Joan M
  • Phillips, Lawrence S
  • Stefanick, Marcia L
  • Wactawski-Wende, Jean
  • Crandall, Carolyn
  • Women’s Health Initiative Investigators
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/102/1/302/2804916
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Context

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials showed protection against hip and total fractures, but a later observational report suggested loss of benefit and a rebound increased risk after cessation of HT.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine fractures after discontinuation of HT.

Design and setting

Two placebo-controlled randomized trials served as the study setting.

Patients

Study patients included WHI participants (N = 15,187) who continued active HT or placebo through the intervention period and who did not take HT in the postintervention period.

Interventions

Trial interventions included conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in naturally menopausal women and CEE alone in women with prior hysterectomy.

Main outcome measures

Total fractures and hip fractures through 5 years after discontinuation of HT were recorded.

Results

Hip fractures were infrequent (∼2.5 per 1000 person-years); this finding was similar between trials and in former HT and placebo groups. There was no difference in total fractures in the CEE + MPA trial for former HT vs former placebo users (28.9 per 1000 person-years and 29.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.63); however, in the CEE-alone trial, total fractures were higher in former placebo users (36.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with the former active group (31.1 per 1000 person-years), a finding that was suggestive of a residual benefit of CEE against total fractures (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

We found no evidence for increased fracture risk, either sustained or transient, for former HT users compared with former placebo users after stopping HT. There was residual benefit for total fractures in former HT users from the CEE-alone study.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item