Skip to main content
Open Access Publications from the University of California

"narten formations" versus "narten roots"


© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Since the existence of a PIE "acrostatic" present formation with descriptive-/é ablaut was first established by Narten (1968), there has been an ongoing debate regarding the status of this type of inflection in the overall PIE morphological system. Is it a lexically determined feature, by which certain roots consistently (at least typically) display ablaut one degree higher than "standard" roots in a given morphological category? Or do "Narten presents" represent merely another means of deriving present (imperfective) stems (originally with a specific Aktionsart), alongside well-known suffixes like? I will present further evidence for the latter viewpoint, thus supporting the independent conclusions in Kümmel 1998.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
Current View