Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

The 1st Annual UCSD Health GME PSQI Symposium was held in May 2022 and featured work from 40 housestaff primary authors and over 120 faculty/staff co-authors.  51 posters were featured at the exhibition and select posters are archived on this site.

Cover page of Physicians as “Patients”- Use of immersive simulated patient experiences to foster physician empathy and compassion

Physicians as “Patients”- Use of immersive simulated patient experiences to foster physician empathy and compassion

(2023)

TITLE: Physicians as “Patients”- Use of immersive simulated patient experiences to foster physician empathy and compassion

AUTHORS: Aaron M. Lee, DO; Sean Kenmore, MD; Supraja Thota, MD; Constance Chance, MD; Anand Jagannath, MD

INSTITUTION: Internal Medicine, University of California-San Diego Medical Center

 

BACKGROUND

The importance of fostering physician empathy has become increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of physician training; among many things, increased physician empathy has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes, higher patient satisfaction, and decreased physician burnout. Despite this, there remains a paucity of interventions to effectively promote compassion and empathy in medical education. To address this void, we propose a set of novel immersive role-reversal simulation exercises which place resident physicians into patient roles to simulate the inpatient experience. We propose that increased appreciation of the patient experience through simulation can lead to improved physician empathy and compassion and thereby improved delivery of patient-centered care.

 

PILOT INTERVENTION

While the ultimate goal is to develop a formal curriculum involving numerous simulation didactics, we developed a pilot program to study the initial feasibility and effectiveness of this intervention.

Aim: Use of a 1-hour noon conference to expose end-of-year interns to numerous aspects of the patient experience to increase appreciate of the inpatient experience

Methods: Several different stations were developed that each highlighted a single aspect of the patient experience. At each station, a prompt provided a simulated patient context/perspective associated with a physical item. These stations included a hospital bed, patient foods, glucometers, bedpans, common patient foods, urinals, nasal cannulas/facemasks, incentive spirometer, oral secretion device, foley and urine leg bag. Participants were given patient gowns, telemetry leads, pulse oximeter leads, to simulate common patient attire. Interns rotated through these stations and were encouraged to discuss openly with their partners their thoughts and feelings from the perspective of the patient. A debrief session was held to reflect on the experience as a group. Learners were asked to complete surveys before and after intervention, evaluating their own empathy and compassion ratings, as well as their appreciation of patient experience.

Results: All 9 participants reported the activity to be useful, and all would recommend to future residents. Overall self-reported empathy and compassion ratings increased post intervention. Notably participants reported increased familiarity with the lived patient experience, increased appreciation of patients’ backgrounds and contexts, improved ability to empathize with patient complaints, and increased importance on the physician-patient interaction.

 

NEXT STEPS:

While initial data was limited due to small number of participants, results were universally positive. Currently, this overall proposal has been accepted past phase 1 for consideration of a Seed Grant with the UCSD Center for Empathy and Compassion. We hope that this funding will allow this novel simulation intervention to be tested and expanded further, and if effective, anticipate it may provide great benefit for patients in the future.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The use of patient experience simulation with resident physicians can be an effective, feasible, and fun modality for promoting physician empathy and compassion. This novel teaching modality has the potential to increase high-value and patient-centered care if adopted across GME.

  • 1 supplemental ZIP

The RISE Project: The Surgery Resident Initiative for Sustaining a Successful Work Environment

(2023)

Introduction: Since the ACGME first instituted duty hours restrictions in 2003, surgery training programs have faced challenges balancing resident wellbeing, quality of education, and quality of patient care. Despite prioritization and significant effort, our general surgery residency continues to be challenged with compliance related to the 80-hour work week.  We sought to explore whether sophisticated quality and process improvement techniques borrowed from industry could be successfully applied to this complex problem in an effort to improve resident well-being and compliance. 

Methods: Lean process improvement methodology was applied to examine the structure of our program, identify best practices in scheduling and day-to-day workflows, uncover variations and opportunities for improvement, and develop targeted countermeasures.

The team reviewed our work hour reporting system, work hours logged, work hour violation occurrences, reasons listed for violations, surgical case volumes and staffing resources on each surgical rotation.

The daily workflow and call schedules for interns, juniors, and senior/chief residents were outlined in a detailed stepwise approach. Pain points and barriers to complying with work hour rules were identified. A resident survey was administered to prioritize which issues had the greatest impact on prolonged work hours or unhealthy working environment. A root cause analysis for each major contributor to non-compliance was conducted. A PICK chart was used to prioritize identified opportunities to improve.

Countermeasures were developed and implemented. Our prospective measurement plan included monthly duty hour logs, monthly rotation evaluations, yearly ACGME survey, and a faculty survey on resident preparedness.

Results: Thirty-six improvement opportunities were identified. Root causes included a tendency to schedule a near-maximum amount of hours, new patient consults that come late in a shift, variability in resident and attending expectations, clinical volume, inefficient workflows, and a culture of work over self. In response to identified issues, there were 15 actionable items.

Figure 1 demonstrates improvement in duty hour violations since implementation of proposed countermeasures.

Conclusions: Lean process improvement methodology can be applied to complex challenges present in our educational programs.  Such an approach led to a significant reduction in work hours and a sustained improvement in duty hour compliance. We are currenty exploring similar methods to address additional challenges in our educational programs.

Population-based evaluation of post-acute COVID-19 chronic sequelae in patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2

(2022)

Background

Many patients who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 continue to experience a constellation of symptoms for months following the initial phase of the infection, often referred to as “Long COVID.” Symptoms include fatigue, shortness of breath and cognitive dysfunction, which may impact daily functioning. The true incidence and comprehensive characteristics of Long COVID symptoms are currently unknown. This is the first population-based outreach study of Long COVID symptoms in patients within an entire health system, conducted to determine operational needs of the health system to care for patients with Long COVID at our multidisciplinary Post-COVID Care Clinic and in the primary care setting.   

Methods

We conducted a survey of patients in our electronic health record (EHR) via email or SMS message who met these inclusion criteria: age 18 years or older, tested positive for COVID-19 at UCSDH between March 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021, and not deceased. Our survey identified patients experiencing symptoms consistent with Long COVID, and characterized the nature and severity of these symptoms and their impact on daily functioning. Rates of Long COVID symptoms were tabulated from patient responses and aligned with demographics from EHR.

Results

The survey was sent to 9,619 patients and achieved a 10.4% response rate. The average age of respondents was 51.5 years (range: 18 – 89 years), and 525 (53%) identified as White, 229 (23%) as Other Race or Mixed Race, 91 (9%) as Asian, 44 (4%) as Black or African American, five (0.5%) as American Indian or Alaska Native, 5 (0.5%) as Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and 100 (10%) were unknown. Of the 999 respondents, almost half (46.3%) replied “yes” or “maybe” to currently having symptoms believed to be caused by having COVID-19. The breakdown of symptoms is depicted in Figure 1, with weakness/tiredness (77.8%), sleep disturbances (67.2%), and difficulty thinking/concentrating (“brain fog”) (64.3%) reported most frequently. Of those experiencing chronic symptoms, 343 (83.9%) had at least three symptoms, with a mean, median and mode of six symptoms (range: 0 – 16). 75/216 (34.7%) of patients reported absences from work/school due to symptoms, 143/216 (66.2%) reported disruption of daily activities, but only 123 reported seeking medical care. 130 (14.8%) reported being hospitalized due to COVID-19, and 74 (8.4%) reported being treated with monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19. 21.7% and 22.6% of respondents screened positive (score of 3+) on the PHQ-2 depression and GAD-2 anxiety screening tools.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this represents the first population-based study of Long COVID symptoms in this spectrum of patients within a health system, particularly as most were not hospitalized for COVID-19 (>85% of respondents). The results demonstrate that patients experiencing Long COVID symptoms have a significant impact on their daily functioning and mental health, with about 1/3 reporting absenteeism and 2/3 reporting daily impact on functioning, and ¼ screening positive for depression and anxiety, which has major implications for population-based screening for post-COVID morbidity. Large population-based surveys like ours can be utilized across health systems to better triage patients with Long COVID who may need closer follow-up care.

  • 1 supplemental ZIP