Background

More than half of homeless adults are of age ≥ 50 years. Falls are a common cause of morbidity in older adults in the general population. Risk factors for falls in the general population include poor health, alcohol use, and exposure to unsafe environments. Homeless adults aged ≥ 50 have a high prevalence of known risk factors and face additional potential risks.

Objectives

To examine the prevalence of and risk of falling in a cohort of older homeless adults.

Design

Longitudinal cohort study with participant interviews every 6 months for 3 years; data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs).

Participants

Three hundred fifty adults aged ≥ 50, homeless at study entry, recruited via population-based sampling.

Measures

The dependent variable is any falls in prior 6 months; independent variables include individual (i.e., illness, behaviors) and social/environmental (i.e., social support, experiencing violence, living unsheltered) factors.

Results

Over three quarters of participants were men (77.1%) and Black (79.7%). The median age was 58 (IQR 54, 61). At baseline, one third (33.7%) reported a fall in the prior 6 months. At follow-up visits, 23.1% to 31.2% of participants reported having fallen. In GEE models, individual risk factors (non-Black race, being a women, older age, functional impairment, urinary incontinence, history of stroke, and use of assistive devices, opioid, and marijuana) were associated with increased odds of falls. Environmental and social factors (spending any nights unsheltered (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.42, CI = 1.10-1.83) and experiencing physical assault (AOR = 1.67, CI = 1.18-2.37) were also associated.

Conclusions

Older homeless adults fall frequently. Likely contributors include having a high prevalence of conditions that increase the risk of falls, compounded by heightened exposure to unsafe environments. Fall prevention in this population should target those at highest risk and address modifiable environmental conditions. Providing shelter or housing and addressing substance use could reduce morbidity from falls in homeless older adults.

OBJECTIVES: Contingency management (CM) is one of the most effective treatments for stimulant use disorder but has not been leveraged for people with stimulant-associated cardiomyopathy (SA-CMP), a chronic health condition with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a multidisciplinary addiction/cardiology clinic with CM for patients with SA-CMP and to explore barriers and facilitators to engagement and recovery. METHODS: We recruited patients with a hospitalization in the past 6 months, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) and stimulant use disorder to participate in Heart Plus, a 12-week addiction/cardiology clinic with CM in an urban, safety-net, hospital-based cardiology clinic, which took place March 2021 through June 2021. Contingency management entailed gift card rewards for attendance and negative point-of-care urine drug screens. Our mixed-methods study used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. We obtained data from the medical record, staff surveys, and qualitative interviews with participants. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were referred, 17 scheduled an appointment, and 12 attended the intake appointment and enrolled in the study. Mean treatment duration was 8 of 12 weeks. Of the 9 participants who attended more than one visit, the median attendance was 82% of available visits for in-person visits and 83% for telephone visits, and all patients reported decreased stimulant use. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering CM through a multidisciplinary addiction/cardiology clinic for patients with SA-CMP was feasible and engaged patients in care. Further research is needed to assess whether this program is associated with improved heart failure outcomes.

Latina women living in low-income communities frequently report a high prevalence of feeling physically and/or emotionally "unwell." Formative focus groups were used to design a 3-session stress reduction curriculum called ¡Venga y Relájese! (Come and relax yourself!). Survey data from 5 Milwaukee cohorts and 1 Peruvian cohort revealed statistically significant improvements in general health status, perceived stress status, and confidence to manage future stress among women who completed all sessions (n=54). The pilot ¡Venga y Relájese! stress reduction curriculum yielded benefits for Latina women living in low-income neighborhoods in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Lima, Peru.