Preschool-age children show essentialism (Gelman, 2003),
ascribing an essence to an object that includes its history, and
which can determine behavior. While infants show the
precursors of essentialism, such as maintaining object
representations during naturalistic occlusion (6-month-olds;
Kaufman, Csibra, & Johnson, 2005), and resisting
individuating two disparate appearances of an object when
shown that one can change into the other (14-month-olds;
Cacchione, Schaub, & Rakoczy, 2013), the implicit precursors
of essentialist reasoning in infants have not been directly
studied. Here we tested whether young infants could use an
object’s prior history to predict its behavior, even after it had
changed into a novel shape. Critically, the object either
smoothly morphed into the novel shape (facilitating an
essentialist interpretation) or was replaced by a new shape
(discouraging essentialist interpretation). Results showed that
9-month-old infants (N = 22) in the Morph condition predicted
the novel object would have the same behavior as the pre-
transformation object; an essentialist interpretation. However,
in the Replace condition (N = 22), predictions for the novel
object were at chance; infants seemed to have lost the link to
the pre-transformation object. Furthermore, results from a
group of 6-month-olds (N = 15) showed that they failed to
maintain this link, even in the Morph condition (which may
indicate a failure to apply essentialist reasoning, or, more
likely, a failure to adequately remember the pre-transformation
object and/or apply the matching rule to predict post-
transformation behavior).