- Godat, Laura N;
- Jensen, Aaron R;
- Stein, Deborah M;
- Arbabi, Saman;
- Bulger, Eileen;
- Cohen, Mitchell J;
- Costantini, Todd W;
- Crandall, Marie M;
- Dicker, Rochelle A;
- Haut, Elliott R;
- Joseph, Bellal;
- Kozar, Rosemary A;
- Malhotra, Ajai K;
- Nathens, Avery B;
- Nirula, Raminder;
- Price, Michelle A;
- Smith, Jason W;
- Stein, Deborah M;
- Zarzaur, Ben L
As trauma surgeons, we focus on the immediate care and needs of the injured patient every day. Historically, trauma and injury research has focused on outcomes such as mortality, complications, and length of stay; and process metrics such as time to CT scan, resuscitation checklist frequencies, or venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates. These outcomes are perceived by healthcare providers to be important, but patients likely have different perceptions of what outcomes are most important to measure and improve. True patient-centered outcomes research involves the healthcare providers, and the entire team of stakeholders including patients and the community. Understanding the process of stakeholder engagement and the barriers trauma researchers must overcome to effectively enter this field of research is important. This summary aims to inform the trauma research community on the basics of patient-centered outcomes research, priorities for funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, resources for collaboration around patient-centered outcomes research, and a unique career development and training opportunity for early career trauma surgeons to develop a skill set in patient-centered outcomes research.