BACKGROUND: Invasive candidiasis/candidemia (IC/C) is associated with a substantial health economic burden driven primarily by prolonged hospital stay. The once-weekly IV echinocandin, rezafungin acetate, has demonstrated non-inferiority to caspofungin in the treatment of IC/C. This paper reports a post hoc pooled exploratory analysis of length of stay (LoS) for hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays in two previously published clinical trials (ReSTORE [NCT03667690] and STRIVE [NCT02734862], that compared rezafungin with daily IV caspofungin (stable patients in the caspofungin group who met relevant criteria could step down to fluconazole after 3 days or more). METHODS: LoS outcomes were analysed descriptively in the pooled modified intention to treat (mITT) population (all patients who had a documented Candida infection in line with trial requirements and received at least one dose of study drug). In addition, to adjust for an imbalance between treatment groups in the proportion receiving mechanical ventilation at baseline, a generalised linear model with mechanical ventilation as a binary covariate was applied. Responses to an exploratory question in the phase 3 trial on possible earlier discharge with weekly rezafungin are also reported. RESULTS: 294 patients were included (rezafungin 139, caspofungin 155), of whom 126 (43%) had ICU admission. Patients treated with rezafungin had a numerically shorter LoS than with caspofungin in all analyses. Mean total LoS was 25.2 days, vs 28.3 days with caspofungin, and mean ICU LoS was 16.1 vs 21.6 days for rezafungin and caspofungin, respectively. After adjustment for mechanical ventilation status the difference in ICU LoS was 4.1 days, a relative difference of 24% (95% CI -11%, 72%). Physicians would have considered earlier discharge for 16% of patients (30/187) with weekly rezafungin, an average of 5-6 days earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Rezafungin may enable shorter hospital and ICU LoS in IC/C compared with daily IV caspofungin, with accompanying savings in resource use. Further research is needed to confirm this in the real-world setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03667690 (ReSTORE; September 12, 2018); NCT02734862 (STRIVE; April 12, 2016).

Plitidepsin, a marine-derived cyclic-peptide, inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication at nanomolar concentrations by targeting the host protein eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A. Here, we show that plitidepsin distributes preferentially to lung over plasma, with similar potency against across several SARS-CoV-2 variants in preclinical studies. Simultaneously, in this randomized, parallel, open-label, proof-of-concept study (NCT04382066) conducted in 10 Spanish hospitals between May and November 2020, 46 adult hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection received either 1.5 mg (n = 15), 2.0 mg (n = 16), or 2.5 mg (n = 15) plitidepsin once daily for 3 d. The primary objective was safety; viral load kinetics, mortality, need for increased respiratory support, and dose selection were secondary end points. One patient withdrew consent before starting procedures; 45 initiated treatment; one withdrew because of hypersensitivity. Two Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed (hypersensitivity and diarrhea). Treatment-related adverse events affecting more than 5% of patients were nausea (42.2%), vomiting (15.6%), and diarrhea (6.7%). Mean viral load reductions from baseline were 1.35, 2.35, 3.25, and 3.85 log₁₀ at days 4, 7, 15, and 31. Nonmechanical invasive ventilation was required in 8 of 44 evaluable patients (16.0%); six patients required intensive care support (13.6%), and three patients (6.7%) died (COVID-19-related). Plitidepsin has a favorable safety profile in patients with COVID-19.