Do children acquire rules for main stress assignment or do
they learn stress in an exemplar-based way? In the
language acquisition literature, the former approach has
been advocated without exception: although they hear
most words produced with their appropriate stress pattern,
children are taken to extract rules and do not store stress
patterns lexically. The evidence for a rule-based approach
is investigated and it will be argued that in the literature
this approach is preferred due to an extremely simplified
interpretation of exemplar-based models. W e will report
experiments showing that Instance-Based Learning, an
exemplar-based model, makes the same kinds of stress
related errors in production that children make: (i) the
amount of production errors is related to metrical
markedness, and (ii) stress shifts and errors with respect to
the segmental and syllabic structure of words typically take
the form of a regularization of stress patterns. InstanceBased Learning belongs to a class of Lazy Learning
algorithms. In these algorithms, no explicit abstractions
in the form of decision trees or rules are derived;
abstraction is driven by similarity during performance.
Our results indicate that at least for this domain, this kind
of lazy learning is a valid alternative to rule-based
learning. Moreover the results plead for a reanalysis of
language acquisition data in terms of exemplar-based
models.