Lumbar spine disease accounts for half of all musculoskeletal complaints and is a major contributor to pain and disability. Surgical intervention is often used as the ultimate management modality among patients with complicated spine conditions. Evidence documents a high prevalence of anxiety among patients with this disease process, and patients with anxiety who receive surgical treatment for low back pathology demonstrate worse postoperative outcomes, including more severe pain, higher rates of postoperative delirium, and increased length of hospital stay when compared to those without anxiety. Despite these known disparities, University of California, San Diego – La Jolla (UCSD – La Jolla) does not screen elective lumbar spine surgical patients for anxiety in the postoperative setting, a time when pain and disability are at their most severe. In response, this project introduced anxiety screening among this patient population using the Anxiety domain of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A) on postoperative day one. Those patients who screened positive for anxiety were referred for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), a therapy which has been shown to effectively ameliorate postoperative pain among lumbar spine patients and postoperative anxiety. This project had three outcome measures: (1) participation rate, or the percentage of patients who accepted the screening protocol, (2) anxiety prevalence, or the percentage of patients who screened positive for anxiety on the HADS-A, and (3) OMT consult rate, or the percentage of patients who received OMT prior to discharge. We screened 20 patients over a period of two weeks. We observed a participation rate of 100%, as well as an OMT consult rate of 100%. Among the 20 patients screened, 35% screened positive for anxiety, and an additional 10% screened as borderline abnormal (or having some evidence of anxiety). When considering individual items on the HADS-A, we found that the item with the highest average score was the one that asked after somatic symptoms, which reinforces the role pain plays postoperatively among this patient population. While we cannot extrapolate the results observed in this project due to the limited sample size, the suggestion that a third of postoperative lumbar spine patients may experience anxiety should act as an impetus for ongoing screening.
Background: To optimize patient outcomes and conserve limited inpatient bedspace, the University of California, Irvine Medical Center Emergency Department (UCIMC ED) developed the COVID Observation Protocol, designed to decompress ED overcrowding, inpatient hospital admissions, and 30-day ED revisitations by discharging patients home on home-oxygen therapy. Methods: A retrospective program evaluation was conducted to assess whether the COVID Observation Protocol reduced 30-day ED readmissions and hospital admissions. Data from the electronic health record (EHR) compared patients presenting to the UCIMC ED pre-and post-implementation. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare inpatient hospitalizations, 30-day ED revisitations, and discharge home with home-oxygen therapy. A thematic analysis was conducted based upon an anonymous online survey to assess the role NPs played during the implementation process. Results: 4,049 patients presented to the ED, 48% before December 29, 2020, and 52% after. Thematic analysis yielded four themes: (1) significant issues with overcrowding in the ED; (2) lack of evidence-based research to support the newly implemented protocol; (3) a general lack of resources; and (4) needing coping skills to manage patients during a pandemic. Inpatient hospitalizations and 30-day ED revisitations were lower before implementation, and more patients were discharged home with home-oxygen therapy before protocol implementation. 30-day revisitations were lower among those discharged home on home-oxygen therapy after protocol implementation. Discussion: The goal of this protocol was to decrease and decompress inpatient admissions and reduce 30-day ED revisitations by discharging them home on home-oxygen therapy. While it was hypothesized that the protocol would reduce the number of inpatient hospitalizations after implementation, this project demonstrated the opposite; however, those patients who were discharged on home-oxygen therapy were significantly less likely to return to the ED within a 30-day timeframe. Analysis of the NP interviews demonstrated a stressful environment in which decisions had to be made to prioritize the sickest of patients with access to limited resources and a challenging practice environment in the mobile field hospital. Conclusion: While, on the surface, it appears that the protocol was not successful, a closer examination of the cohort discharged home on home-oxygen therapy after December 29, 2020, demonstrated a significant reduction in 30-day ED revisitations. Despite the number of confounding items, this scholarly project has demonstrated that the updated protocol was successful in reducing revisitation rates and warrants further analysis.
Cookie SettingseScholarship uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience on our website. You can manage which cookies you want us to use.Our Privacy Statement includes more details on the cookies we use and how we protect your privacy.