In this dissertation, I investigate how identity, attitudes, and social context shape adolescents’ experiences of teen dating violence (TDV). Although TDV is a persistent public health concern, much of the existing literature relies on broad demographic categories and risk-based frameworks that obscure variation within adolescent populations. Drawing on survey data from the Teen Dating Experiences Survey, I examine how sexual and gender identities structure experiences of dating violence, how adolescents evaluate the acceptability of violence in romantic relationships, and where violence occurs within adolescents’ social worlds. Together, these studies advance a more nuanced understanding of TDV by centering heterogeneity in adolescents’ identities, perceptions, and relationship contexts.In Chapter 2, I examine variation in physical, psychological, sexual, and cyber TDV victimization and perpetration across inclusive sexual and gender identity categories. Contrary to assumptions that sexual and gender minority youth face uniformly elevated risk, I find substantial variation across identities. Heterosexual and cisgender youth report significantly higher rates of violence than many sexual and gender minority groups, while pansexual and asexual youth report the lowest rates across several forms of TDV. These findings highlight the importance of disaggregating sexual and gender identities when studying adolescent relationships. In Chapter 3, I investigate adolescents’ attitudes toward TDV by examining conditional tolerance of physical, psychological, cyber, and sexual violence. Results indicate that sexual identity is a strong predictor of normative evaluations of dating violence, with most sexual minority youth demonstrating lower levels of conditional tolerance than their heterosexual peers. Gender identity, by contrast, plays a comparatively limited role in shaping attitudes toward TDV. In Chapter 4, I shift attention to the social geography of TDV by examining where violence occurs and how location relates to relationship characteristics and power dynamics. I find that violence is concentrated in private settings, particularly adolescents’ and partners’ homes, while violence occurring across multiple contexts is most strongly associated with relationship power imbalances, severity, and frequency rather than demographic characteristics. Together, these findings challenge assumptions of homogeneity in adolescent dating relationships and demonstrate that experiences of TDV are structured by identity, relational dynamics, and situational context. By examining who experiences violence, how adolescents evaluate it, and where it occurs, this dissertation advances scholarship on adolescent relationships and provides a foundation for more nuanced prevention, intervention, and educational efforts aimed at reducing TDV.