Ocean wave energy is currently an untapped resource with tremendous potential. Recent studiesestimate the U.S. technical wave energy resource at 1400 TWhr/year (34% of US electricity
consumption in 2019). This is a massive amount of unused renewable energy that could be harnessed
along both coasts of the U.S. However, technical challenges and a high levelized cost of
energy (LCOE) have led to wave energy not being utilized on a societal scale. In various cost studies
and surveys of wave energy converter (WEC) technology developers, structural material costs
(usually steel) were identified as the leading cost driver of LCOE. With this challenge in mind,
innovative ideas, materials, and designs to cut down the structural material costs for WECs could
provide the biggest lever arm to make utility scale wave energy cost competitive. Alongside the
potential of large-scale, utility power WECs, there is a need for continuous power at smaller scales
(hundreds of watts to a few kilowatts) for applications like powering ocean observing platforms or
remote charging of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV). At these small scales, ongoing technical
issues include providing continuous power in small sea states and reducing the complexity of
installation procedures.
One design idea that could address the technical challenges at large and small WEC scales is toreplace most or all of a WEC’s structure with inflatables, which use thin, flexible fabrics and pressurized
fluid (air or water) to create rigidity and volume. Inflatable WEC absorber structures could
enable systems with lower capital and operational costs with reduced and lighter materials, and
lower peak forces through active and passive load mitigation. Geometry control with inflatables,
or the ability to adjust a WECs surface area and volume, is possible with water pumps or air compressors,
and allows for increased energy capture in low sea states with inflation, and lower forces
in storm sea states with deflation. Inflatable fabrics would create easy-to-manage devices that are
smaller in size and weight when installed or removed for maintenance, because of their capacity
to be deflated and folded up. This could allow for entirely new installation and/or maintenance
procedures with different marine vessel classes than what is common with expensive offshore operations
of conventional marine structures. However, open questions remain about the effect of
inflatable flexibility on power generation performance at small and large WEC scales, and on the
practicality and effects of an inflation control strategy.
This dissertation will address these open questions on inflatable WEC structure performance relativeto rigid equivalents through the use of numerical modeling of small and large scale WECs with
inflatable structures. Structural flexibility is included in the WEC performance analysis through
the use of the mid-fidelity generalized modes method. In this method, the structural mode shapes
and natural frequencies are added as additional modes on top of the six traditional rigid body
modes evaluated in hydrodynamic and multi-body dynamics analyses. In this work, modal analysis
is completed in ANSYS, hydrodynamic modeling with the WAMIT boundary element method
(BEM) potential flow solver, and time-domain WEC performance analysis using the open source
WEC-Sim code in Matlab/Simulink. This process is repeated for both large scale (25 m diameter)
and small scale (2 m diameter) heaving WECs simulated in regular and irregular waves with variable
passive damping power take-off (PTO) systems. At small scales when the inflatable makes up
the full absorber body, the flexibility of an inflatable is found to be small and a rigid body assumption is valid for realistic air pressures. The flexibility effect is small and mostly positive (-1% to
+8%) on power production, with the main different from a rigid body at low wave periods ( 5 s).
With these small changes, it is assumed the same PTO can be used with a rigid or inflatable absorber.
With the effects of inflatable flexibility quantified at small scale, another chapter analyzes
a WEC of this same size but with inflation geometry control in the form of inflatables that can
expand the WEC diameter from 2 to 3 m. In this case, the inflatables are assumed to be pressurized
until rigid. Using this design, an inflation control strategy is formulated where inflation is based on
the current sea state (significant wave height and peak period pair). This geometry control ability
is found to increase power production by 1.1-2.1 times, depending on deployment location and
PTO power limits. Also, less than 1% of the energy increase from using inflation control is needed
to power the air compressor for the developed inflation control strategy in a representative year
lending merits to the benefit and feasibility of this strategy.
At large scales, where the analyzed WEC is comprised of inflatables in the center of a rigid cylindricalWEC, inflatable flexibility leads to a reduction in power production relative to a fully rigid
design. WEC designs with different amounts of rigid reinforcement in the form of steel beams
supporting the inflatables are also analyzed. With three steel beams, the structure with inflatables
can perform as well as the fully rigid design while still enabling inflation geometry control for load
reduction. To make economic comparisons, the material and manufacturing cost estimates from
the U.S. DOE Wave Energy prize are implemented. Techno-economic comparisons are completed
using the ACE metric also developed for the prize, an early stage technology proxy to LCOE,
defined by the ratio of wave power capture efficiency to structural capital costs. On a structural
cost and techno-economic basis using the ACE metric, the WEC with inflatables and some rigid
reinforcement outperforms the fully-rigid design.
The results from this dissertation are valuable to WEC technology developers and researchers.At small scale, the results from this analysis provide confidence that inflatables can be used in
place of a rigid structure with no detrimental effects on power production. Additionally, inflation
control’s influence on power production improvements are as effective as reactive PTO control
when realistic PTO efficiencies are considered. For large WECs, it can be concluded that some
rigid reinforcement may be needed to ensure the same power production as a rigid equivalent. But
even with this reinforcement, the economics are better for the inflatable design. Hopefully, these
results draw interest in future studies on different WEC architectures using inflatables and motivate
both wave tank and open ocean testing and deployments of inflatable structures.