Objectives

Chronic care models improved outcomes for persons with mental disorders but to date have primarily been tested for single diagnoses (e.g. unipolar depression). We report findings from a pilot multisite randomized controlled trial of a cross-diagnosis care model for patients with mood disorders.

Methods

Patients (N = 60) seen in one of four primary care or mental health clinics affiliated with the National Network of Depression Centers were randomized to receive a mood disorder care model, Life Goals Collaborative Care (LGCC, N = 29) or usual care (N = 31). LGCC consisted of five group self-management sessions focused on mood symptom coping and health behavior change strategies followed by monthly patient and provider care management contacts for up to 6 months. Outcomes at 3 and 6 months included mood symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-PHQ-9, Internal State Scale-well-being, Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale) and health-related quality of life.

Results

Of the 60 enrolled, the mean age was 46.2 (SD = 13.2), 73.3% were female, 16.7% were non-white, and 36.8% had a bipolar disorder diagnosis. LGCC was associated with greater likelihood of depressive symptom remission in 6 months (respectively, 50% versus 19% had a PHQ-9 score ≤9 and 50% reduction in PHQ-9 score, P = .04) and improved well-being (β = 2.66, P ≤ .01, Cohen's D = 0.43).

Conclusions

LGCC may improve outcomes for patients regardless of mood diagnosis, potentially providing a feasible and generalizable chronic care model for routine practice settings.

Adequate sampling is essential to an accurate pathologic evaluation of pancreatectomy specimens resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). However, limited data are available for the association between the sampling and survival in these patients. We examined the association of the entire submission of the tumor (ESOT) and the entire submission of the pancreas (ESOP) with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as their correlations with clinicopathologic features, for 627 patients with PDAC who received NAT and pancreaticoduodenectomy. We demonstrated that both ESOT and ESOP were associated with lower ypT, less frequent perineural invasion, and better tumor response (p < 0.05). ESOP was also associated with a smaller tumor size (p < 0.001), more lymph nodes (p < 0.001), a lower ypN stage (p < 0.001), better differentiation (p = 0.02), and less frequent lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.009). However, since ESOP and ESOT were primarily conducted for cases with no grossly identifiable tumor or minimal residual carcinoma in initial sections, potential bias cannot be excluded. Both ESOT and ESOP were associated with less frequent recurrence/metastasis and better DFS and OS (p < 0.05) in the overall study population. ESOP was associated with better DFS and better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors and better OS in patients with complete or near-complete response (p < 0.05). ESOT was associated with better OS in patients with ypT0/ypT1 or ypN0 tumors (p < 0.05). Both ESOT and ESOP were independent prognostic factors for OS according to multivariate survival analyses. Therefore, accurate pathologic evaluation using ESOP and ESOT is associated with the prognosis in PDAC patients with complete or near-complete pathologic response and ypT0/ypT1 tumor after NAT.