Purpose

Although patellofemoral complications after kinematically aligned (KA) TKA are infrequent, the patellar flexion angle and proximal-distal patellar contact location through flexion, and incidence of patellar loss of contact at full extension are unknown. The present study determined whether the patellar flexion angle and proximal-distal patellar contact location of a KA TKA performed with anatomic, fixed-bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components differed from those of the native contralateral knee during a deep knee bend, and determined the incidence of patellar loss of contact at full extension for KA TKA only.

Methods

During a deep knee bend from full extension to maximum flexion, both knees were imaged in a lateral view using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a healthy native knee in the contralateral limb. The patellar flexion angle and proximal-distal patellar contact location were measured on images from full extension to maximum flexion in 30° increments. Paired t tests at each flexion angle determined the significance of the difference between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees. In the KA TKA knees, the incidence of patellar loss of contact at full extension was determined. Patient-reported outcome scores also were recorded including the Oxford Knee Score.

Results

Mean patellar flexion angles were not different between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees throughout the motion arc. The largest statistically significant difference in the mean proximal-distal patellar contact locations was 4 mm. The incidence of patellar loss of contact in the KA TKA knees at full extension was 8% (2 of 25 patients). The median Oxford Knee Score was 46 out of 48.

Conclusions

Calipered KA TKA performed with anatomic, fixed-bearing, PCR components restored patellar flexion angles to native and largely restored the proximal-distal patellar contact locations, which at most differed from the native contralateral knee by approximately 10% of the mean proximal-distal patellar length. In the KA TKA knees, the incidence of patellar loss of contact was infrequent. These objective biomechanical results are consistent with the relatively high subjective patient-reported outcome scores herein and support the low incidence of patellofemoral complications following KA TKA previously reported.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic, level III.

Purpose

Because different targets are used for internal-external rotation, an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment may lead to under-coverage and concomitant posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment following unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA. Recognizing that such loading can lead to premature wear and/or subsidence, our aim was to determine the cause(s) so that occurrence could be remedied. Our hypothesis was that baseplate design features such as asymmetric shape when aligned in KA would consistently contribute to posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment.

Methods

Based on analysis of fluoroscopic images of 50 patients performing dynamic, weight bearing deep knee bend and step up and of postoperative CT images, five possible causes were investigated. Causes included internal rotation of the baseplate when positioned in KA; posterior position of the lateral femoral condyle at extension; internal tibial rotation with flexion; internal rotational deviation of the baseplate from the KA rotation target; and posterior slope.

Results

The incidence of posterior rim loading was 18% (9 of 50 patients). When positioned in KA, the asymmetric baseplate left 15% versus 10% of the AP depth of the lateral compartment uncovered posteriorly for posterior rim loading and non-posterior rim loading groups, respectively (p = 0.009). The lateral femoral condyle at extension was more posterior by 4 mm for the posterior rim loading group (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment was caused in part by the asymmetric design of the tibial baseplate designed for mechanical alignment which was internally rotated when positioned in KA thus under-covering a substantial percentage of the posterior lateral tibia. This highlights the need for new, asymmetric baseplates designed to maximize coverage when used in KA.

Level of evidence

III.

Purpose

Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior-posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up.

Methods

Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact.

Results

Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm, p = 0.0009 and 7 mm, p < 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm, p < 0.0001 and 8 mm, p < 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48).

Conclusions

Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic, Level III.