Lamellar macular holes present distinct morphological features including tractional or non-tractional epimacular membranes, foveal tissue alterations, defects of the outer retinal layers, or a separation of the retinal layers. At present, degenerative lamellar holes are differentiated from tractional holes based on the morphological characteristics seen in OCT. The current treatment approach is based on this gross differentiation. Considering the recent developments in high-resolution imaging, this classification needs to be revisited since morphological features may present simultaneously, making it difficult to separate these entities. In addition, a revisited classification may be of value to better standardize the indication for surgical treatment.

Purpose

To determine clear-cut distinctions between tractional and exudative intraretinal cystoid spaces subtypes.

Design

Retrospective, multicenter, observational case series.

Methods

A cohort of patients diagnosed with intraretinal cystoid spaces and imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), blue fundus autofluorescence (BFAF), en face OCT, and OCT angiography (OCT-A) was included in the study. All images were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated.

Results

In this study were included 72 eyes of 69 patients. Exudative intraretinal cystoid spaces (36/72 eyes, 50%) displayed a "petaloid" morphology as seen with en face OCT, FA, and BFAF. Tractional intraretinal cystoid spaces (24/72 eyes, 33.3%), displayed a radial "spoke-wheel" en face OCT pattern. There was no leakage with FA and BFAF did not reveal specific patterns. Eyes with full-thickness macular hole (FTMH, 12/72 eyes, 16.7%) displayed a "sunflower" en face OCT appearance. FTMH showed OCT, OCT-A, and BFAF features of both exudative and tractional cystoid spaces, but without any FA leakage. Inner nuclear layer (INL) thickness was significantly lower in tractional cystoid spaces (P < .001). There were a greater number of INL cystoid spaces in both the exudative and FTMH subgroups (P = .001). The surface area of INL cystoid spaces was significantly lower in the tractional subgroup (P < .001). There was a significant reduction of the microvascular density in eyes with exudative vs tractional (P = .002) and FTMH (P < .001) subgroups.

Conclusions

Exudative and tractional intraretinal cystoid spaces displayed characteristic multimodal imaging features and they may represent 2 different pathologic conditions with equally different clinical implications.

Background

A consensus on an optical coherence tomography definition of lamellar macular hole (LMH) and similar conditions is needed.

Methods

The panel reviewed relevant peer-reviewed literature to reach an accord on LMH definition and to differentiate LMH from other similar conditions.

Results

The panel reached a consensus on the definition of three clinical entities: LMH, epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis and macular pseudohole (MPH). LMH definition is based on three mandatory criteria and three optional anatomical features. The three mandatory criteria are the presence of irregular foveal contour, the presence of a foveal cavity with undermined edges and the apparent loss of foveal tissue. Optional anatomical features include the presence of epiretinal proliferation, the presence of a central foveal bump and the disruption of the ellipsoid zone. ERM foveoschisis definition is based on two mandatory criteria: the presence of ERM and the presence of schisis at the level of Henle's fibre layer. Three optional anatomical features can also be present: the presence of microcystoid spaces in the inner nuclear layer (INL), an increase of retinal thickness and the presence of retinal wrinkling. MPH definition is based on three mandatory criteria and two optional anatomical features. Mandatory criteria include the presence of a foveal sparing ERM, the presence of a steepened foveal profile and an increased central retinal thickness. Optional anatomical features are the presence of microcystoid spaces in the INL and a normal retinal thickness.

Conclusions

The use of the proposed definitions may provide uniform language for clinicians and future research.

Background: A consensus on an optical coherence tomography (OCT) definition of lamellar macular hole (LMH) and similar conditions is needed. Methods: The panel reviewed relevant peer-reviewed literature to reach a consensus on LMH definition and to differentiate LMH from other similar conditions. Results: The panel reached a consensus on the definition of 3 clinical entities: LMH, epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis and macular pseudohole (MPH). LMH definition is based on 3 mandatory criteria and 3 optional anatomical features. The 3 mandatory criteria are the presence of irregular foveal contour, the presence of a foveal cavity with undermined edges, and the apparent loss of foveal tissue. Optional anatomical features include the presence of epiretinal proliferation, the presence of a foveal bump and the disruption of the ellipsoid line. ERM foveoschisis definition is based on 2 mandatory criteria: the presence of ERM and the presence of schisis at the level of Henle’s fiber layer. Three optional anatomical features can also be present: the presence of microcystoid spaces in the inner nuclear layer (INL), an increase of retinal thickness, and the presence of retinal wrinkling. MPH definition is based on 3 mandatory criteria and 2 optional anatomical features. Mandatory criteria include the presence of a foveal sparing ERM, the presence of a steepened foveal profile and an increased central retinal thickness. Optional anatomical features are the presence of microcystoid spaces in the INL and a normal retinal thickness. Conclusions: The use of the proposed definitions may provide uniform language for clinicians and future research.