Purpose

Symptoms associated with COVID-19 infection have made the assessment and triage of cancer patients extremely complicated. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and implementation of a COVID-19 screening tool for oncology telephone triage.

Methods

An Ambulatory Oncology Clinical Nurse Educator and three faculty members worked on the development of an oncology specific triage tool based on the challenges that oncology nurses were having with the generic COVID triage tool. A thorough search of the published literature, as well as pertinent websites, verified that no screening tool for oncology patients was available.

Results

The screening tool met a number of essential criteria: (1) simple and easy to use, (2) included the most common signs and symptoms as knowledge of COVID-19 infection changed, (3) was congruent with the overall screening procedures of the medical center, (4) included questions about risk factors for and environmental exposures related to COVID-19, and (5) assessed patient's current cancer history and treatment status. Over a period of 3 weeks, the content and specific questions on the tool were modified based on information obtained from a variety of sources and feedback from the triage nurses.

Conclusion

Within 1 month, the tool was developed and implemented in clinical practice. Oncology clinicians can modify this tool to triage patients as well as to screen patients in a variety of outpatient settings (e.g., chemotherapy infusion units, radiation therapy departments). The tool will require updates and modifications based on available resources and individual health care organizations' policies and procedures.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing cancer treatment experience global stress and cancer-specific stress. Both types of stress are associated with a higher symptom burden. OBJECTIVE: In this cross-sectional study, we used a comprehensive set of demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics to evaluate their relative contribution to the severity of global and cancer-specific stress. METHODS: Patients (N = 941) completed study questionnaires before their second or third cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Consistent with our a priori hypothesis, we found both common and distinct characteristics associated with higher levels of global stress and cancer-specific stress. A significant proportion of our patients had scores on the Impact of Event Scale-Revised suggestive of subsyndromal (29.4%) or probable (13.9%) posttraumatic stress disorder. Four of the 5 stepwise linear regression analyses for the various stress scales explained between 41.6% and 54.5% of the total variance. Compared with various demographic and clinical characteristics, many of the common symptoms associated with cancer and its treatments uniquely explained a higher percentage of the variance in the various stress scales. Symptoms of depression made the largest unique contribution to the percentage of total explained variance across all 5 scales. CONCLUSION: Clinicians need to assess for global stress, cancer-specific stress, and depression in patients receiving chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients may benefit from integrative interventions (eg, mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture) that simultaneously address stress and symptoms commonly associated with cancer and its treatments.

Background

Training in patient safety, quality, and management is a key component of Graduate Medical Education (GME) training in all specialties. However, residency programs, especially Pathology programs, often find it challenging to create strong learning opportunities in these areas.

Objectives

Focused quality assurance (QA) projects are one approach to teach and engage trainees in these key areas. Residents have been historically involved in different QA projects in our department but mainly in small secondary roles. Leading a large QA project that can enhance residents' management skills and improve clinical operations in our laboratory was the main objective of our project.

Description

A new process for laboratory self-inspection led by residents was implemented that simulates the exact process of a formal outside College of American Pathologists (CAP) inspection. We aim to prove that resident-led QA activities not only have profound educational benefit but can also result in significant performance and operational improvement.

Results

For this paper, we focus on the Histology laboratory since the ramifications from the self-inspection process during a three year period were profound leading to change in management, workflow changes, and notable improvement in staff morale.

Conclusion

The self-inspection process exposed the residents to operational issues and corrective actions that provided them the opportunity to take a more active role in laboratory management and helped prepare them for post-graduation challenges. It also helped the department identify and rectify many operational issues, confirmed by the enumeration of CAP deficiencies and significant improvement of staff morale.