Study objectives

Recent initiatives to discourage overprescription of sleep medications have increased awareness of their potential adverse effects; however, it is unknown whether these efforts translated into a decline in use of these medications in the United States. We assessed recent national trends in the use of medications used for sleep disturbance.

Methods

We used data from n = 29,400 participants in the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. At each of three waves of in-person assessments, participants presented prescription bottles for all medications used in the prior month. Interviewers recorded each medication and participants self-reported duration and reasons for use. We identified all medications used for sleep disturbance and categorized medications into two categories: Food and Drug Administration-approved sleep medications and those used off-label for sleep disturbance. We examined changes in the prevalence in use of these medications across the study period.

Results

The odds of using medications for sleep disturbance decreased 31% between 2013 and 2018 (odds ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.93, P = .015). This trend was driven by declines in use of Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for sleep disturbance, especially for medium- and long-term duration of use. Notably, among those age 80+ years, we observed an 86% decline (odds ratio = 0.14, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.36, P < .001) in use of Food and Drug Administration-approved sleep medications over the study period.

Conclusions

Use of prescription medications for sleep disturbance declined nationally, suggesting a possible effect of efforts to curb overprescription and encourage judicious use of these agents. Future research needs to examine whether these changes have coincided with improved population sleep health.

Citation

Kaufmann CN, Spira AP, Wickwire EM, et al. Declining trend in use of medications for sleep disturbance in the United States from 2013 to 2018. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(10):2459-2465.

UNLABELLED: Sleep medicine remains an underrepresented medical specialty worldwide, with significant geographic disparities with regard to training, number of available sleep specialists, sleep laboratory or clinic infrastructures, and evidence-based clinical practices. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) is committed to facilitating the education of sleep medicine professionals to ensure high-quality, evidence-based clinical care and improve access to sleep centers around the world, particularly in developing countries. In 2002, the AASM launched an annual 4-week training program called Mini-Fellowship for International Scholars, designed to support the establishment of sleep medicine in developing countries. The participating fellows were generally chosen from areas that lacked a clinical infrastructure in this specialty and provided with training in AASM Accredited sleep centers. This manuscript presents an overview of the program, summarizes the outcomes, successes, and lessons learned during the first 12 years, and describes a set of programmatic changes for the near-future, as assembled and proposed by the AASM Education Committee and recently approved by the AASM Board of Directors. CITATION: Ioachimescu OC; Wickwire EM; Harrington J; Kristo D; Arnedt JT; Ramar K; Won C; Billings ME; DelRosso L; Williams S; Paruthi S; Morgenthaler TI. A dozen years of American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) international mini-fellowship: program evaluation and future directions.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe initial insomnia-related encounters among a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries, and to identify older adults at risk for potentially inappropriate prescription insomnia medication usage. METHODS: Our data source was a random 5% sample of Medicare administrative claims data (2006-2013). Insomnia was operationalized as International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes. Insomnia medications included FDA-approved insomnia-related medication classes and drugs. Logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of being prescribed only (i.e., being prescribed an insomnia medication without a corresponding insomnia diagnosis). RESULTS: A total of N = 60 362 beneficiaries received either an insomnia diagnosis or a prescription for an insomnia medication as their first sleep-related encounter during the study period. Of these, 55.1% (n = 33 245) were prescribed only, whereas 44.9% (n = 27 117) received a concurrent insomnia diagnosis. In a fully adjusted regression model, younger age (odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98, 0.99), male sex (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.11, 1.20), and several comorbid conditions (i.e., dementia [OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.15, 1.27] and anemia [OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.13, 1.22]) were positively associated with being prescribed only. Conversely, black individuals (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.78, 0.89) and those of other race (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.84, 0.94) were less likely to be prescribed only. Individuals who received care from a board-certified sleep medicine provider (BCSMP) were less likely to be prescribed only (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.16, 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of Medicare beneficiaries prescribed insomnia medications ever received a formal sleep-related diagnosis.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of sleep disturbances on subsequent depressive symptomatology among a representative sample of patients following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Within a retrospective cohort design, our sample included 305 individuals from the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Pilot (TRACK-TBI Pilot; NINDS-OD09-004) database. At 3-months post-TBI, symptoms of insomnia were reported by 34% of patients, and symptoms of hypersomnia were reported by 39% of patients. For the vast majority of individuals, sleep complaints were likely to persist through 6-month follow-up. Symptoms of hypersomnia but not insomnia at three months were associated with worsened depressive symptomatology at six months. These results highlight the importance of sleep disturbances in recovery from TBI and suggest targeted sleep treatments as a pathway to improve outcomes and quality of life following TBI.

A rapidly expanding scientific literature supports the frequent co-occurrence of sleep and circadian disturbances following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Although many questions remain unanswered, the preponderance of evidence suggests that sleep and circadian disorders can result from mTBI. Among those with mTBI, sleep disturbances and clinical sleep and circadian disorders contribute to the morbidity and long-term sequelae across domains of functional outcomes and quality of life. Specifically, along with deterioration of neurocognitive performance, insufficient and disturbed sleep can precede, exacerbate, or perpetuate many of the other common sequelae of mTBI, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and chronic pain. Further, sleep and mTBI share neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic mechanisms that likely bear directly on success of rehabilitation following mTBI. For these reasons, focus on disturbed sleep as a modifiable treatment target has high likelihood of improving outcomes in mTBI. Here, we review relevant literature and present a research agenda to 1) advance understanding of the reciprocal relationships between sleep and circadian factors and mTBI sequelae and 2) advance rapidly the development of sleep-related treatments in this population.

Objectives

To provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance to the public regarding indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span.

Methods

The National Sleep Foundation assembled a panel of experts from the sleep community and representatives appointed by stakeholder organizations (Sleep Quality Consensus Panel). A systematic literature review identified 277 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Abstracts and full-text articles were provided to the panelists for review and discussion. A modified Delphi RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with 3 rounds of voting was used to determine agreement.

Results

For most of the sleep continuity variables (sleep latency, number of awakenings >5minutes, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency), the panel members agreed that these measures were appropriate indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span. However, overall, there was less or no consensus regarding sleep architecture or nap-related variables as elements of good sleep quality.

Conclusions

There is consensus among experts regarding some indicators of sleep quality among otherwise healthy individuals. Education and public health initiatives regarding good sleep quality will require sustained and collaborative efforts from multiple stakeholders. Future research should explore how sleep architecture and naps relate to sleep quality. Implications and limitations of the consensus recommendations are discussed.