The hippocampal CA1 subregion is critical for processing spatial and episodic memories. As the principal cell type, CA1 pyramidal neurons have been found to represent variables that are essential for spatial navigation and elements in episodic memory. At the same time, multiple CA1 pyramidal neurons can display synchronized activations, which can represent complex memory elements that individual neurons cannot process. An important question to date is how the co-activated CA1 pyramidal neurons are spatially organized in anatomical space. Existing research on this question had provided contradictory results, and were all subjected to limitations, for example, the limited anatomical resolution for the electrophysiological-based studies, and the limited behavior for the two-photon based studies. Another question is how the organized co-activations of CA1 pyramidal neurons are affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Existing studies have revealed that AD can induce aberrant activation pattern in individual pyramidal neurons, and has negative impact on the circuit connectivity, but no study have investigated AD’s potential influence on the anatomical organizations of the co-activating neuron subgroups. Here I utilized a novel imaging technique, the head-mounted miniature microscope (Miniscope), to investigate the ensemble activities of CA1 pyramidal neurons with the limitations above largely addressed. In Chapter 1, I used Miniscope to record neural ensemble activities in mouse hippocampal CA1 and identified sub-populations of excitatory neurons that co-active across the same second-long period of time while also clustered in anatomical space. This kind of organization vary in membership and activity dynamics with respect to movement in different environments, and appear during immobility in the dark, suggesting internal mechanisms that guide their formation. In Chapter 2, I used Miniscope to investigate the populational CA1 neural activities in both wildtype and 3xTg AD mice, an Alzheimer’s disease model mouse type contains three mutations associated with familial Alzheimer's disease. I identified hyperactivations among the CA1 pyramidal neuron populations in AD mice at different ages in open field exploration, as well as impaired spatial representation illustrated by lower spatial information score and higher sparsity. Having established Miniscope’s ability to identify anatomical organization of co-activated CA1 pyramidal neurons, and to reveal the difference of their firing profile between control and AD genotypes, I examined the discovered temporal-anatomical pyramidal neuron clusters to both wildtype (WT) and 5xFAD mice under different ages. I found the clusters existed in both genotypes and no difference was noted for intra-cluster pairwise correlation and anatomical cluster size. When examining the cluster-level ensemble representation of the environment, young AD mice show a lower level of specificity between the labelling of different clusters, but no differences were noted between WT and AD for other age groups. Both WT and AD displayed elevated cluster dissimilarity between linear tracks with 90-degree direction difference, but only at 8~10-month age. Finally, the segregation level of the anatomical clusters, measured by the mosaic level metric, displayed significant negative correlation with the averaged pairwise correlation strength in young and mid WT mice, as well as young AD mice, but showed no significant relationship with the correlation of spatial rate maps. Together, the thesis describes a previously under studied organization of CA1 pyramidal neurons and performs preliminary investigation of how this organization behaves under AD conditions. The results should contribute to our understanding of CA1 neural organizations that support the region’s memory processing function.