UCLA School of Law

Increasingly, claims of morality's overridingness are met with resistance, especially from theorists who regard moral reasons as, in an important sense, subjective. This paper challenges this resistance by arguing that moral overridingness may be reconciled with this significant form of subjectivism about moral reasons. It does not argue for or even endorse this form of subjectivism. In fact, I suspect the view is false. Nevertheless, because of subjectivism's persistent pull, it is worth exploring the view's ramifications and, in particular, the degree to which -- through its challenge to overridingness -- it would be deflationary of morality's authority. Moreover, such an exploration will show that a critical source of overridingness may be found in features of morality that are intrinsic to its structure.