Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
The Case Against Statistics-as-Methods: Confessions of a Born-Again Planmaker
© 1988 by the author(s). Learn more.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.5070/BP33213183Abstract
I n most planning programs, "methods" mean statistics. I n a 1 983 survey of 71 North American planning schools, E.H. Baxter found that statistics, chiefly inferential statistics, formed the core component of first-year planning methods classes in almost all of the planning pro grams surveyed ( 1 983). What explains this popularity? Statistics, I sus pect, has much the same appeal as a succesfs ul political candidate - although exciting to only a few, it is nontheless acceptable to many.