Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

  • Author(s): US Preventive Services Task Force
  • Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
  • Grossman, David C
  • Curry, Susan J
  • Davidson, Karina W
  • Ebell, Mark
  • Epling, John W
  • García, Francisco AR
  • Gillman, Matthew W
  • Kemper, Alex R
  • Krist, Alex H
  • Kurth, Ann E
  • Landefeld, C Seth
  • Mangione, Carol M
  • Phillips, William R
  • Phipps, Maureen G
  • Pignone, Michael P
  • Siu, Albert L
  • et al.
Abstract

IMPORTANCE:Basal and squamous cell carcinoma are the most common types of cancer in the United States and represent the vast majority of all cases of skin cancer; however, they rarely result in death or substantial morbidity, whereas melanoma skin cancer has notably higher mortality rates. In 2016, an estimated 76,400 US men and women will develop melanoma and 10,100 will die from the disease. OBJECTIVE:To update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for skin cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW:The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination in reducing skin cancer morbidity and mortality and death from any cause; its potential harms, including any harms resulting from associated diagnostic follow-up; its test characteristics when performed by a primary care clinician vs a dermatologist; and whether its use leads to earlier detection of skin cancer compared with usual care. FINDINGS:Evidence to assess the net benefit of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination is limited. Direct evidence on the effectiveness of screening in reducing melanoma morbidity and mortality is limited to a single fair-quality ecologic study with important methodological limitations. Information on harms is similarly sparse. The potential for harm clearly exists, including a high rate of unnecessary biopsies, possibly resulting in cosmetic or, more rarely, functional adverse effects, and the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION:The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in adults (I statement).

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
Current View