Rilonacept Reduces Pericarditis Recurrence Risk, Hospitalizations, and ED visits: Outcomes from the RESONANCE Patient Registry
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Rilonacept Reduces Pericarditis Recurrence Risk, Hospitalizations, and ED visits: Outcomes from the RESONANCE Patient Registry

Abstract

RILONACEPT REDUCES PERICARDITIS RECURRENCE RISK, HOSPITALIZATIONS, AND ED VISITS: OUTCOMES FROM THE RESONANCE PATIENT REGISTRY

Paul C. Cremer, MD1, Michael S. Garshick, MD2,3, Sushil A. Luis, MBBS, PhD4,  Ajit Raisinghani, MD5, Brittany Weber, MD, PhD6,  MohamedAl-Kazaz, MD1, Tracy Hagerty, MD7, John J. Ryan, MD8, Jonathan R. Salik, MD9, Taylor Corey10, Vidhya Parameswaran, MPH10, Allan L. Klein, MD11, John F. Paolini, MD, PhD10, on behalf of the RESONANCE Study Group.

Presenter: Corina Grancorvitz10

*Corresponding author:

Vidhya Parameswaran, MPH

Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals

100 Hayden Ave. Lexington, MA 02421

+1 7814319100

vparameswaran@kiniksa.com

 

1Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

2Cardio-Rheumatology Program, Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA

3Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

4Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

5Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA

6Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women‘s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

7University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA

8University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

9Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

10Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Corp., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA

11Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 

Word count: (245/375) words (NO FIGURES)

Background: Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is an IL-1-mediated chronic autoinflammatory disease. Based on clinical trial evidence, the 2025 ACC Concise Clinical Guidance (ACC CCG) on RP management elevated IL-1 pathway inhibition to 2nd line as the preferred option over corticosteroids (CS) after NSAIDs/colchicine.

Methods: Annualized recurrence rate (ARR) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data were extracted by chart review from pts who had 1 yr minimum follow-up in RESONANCE, a multicenter US RP pt registry, and were compared by RP treatment regimen.

Results: As of 15 Aug 2025, of the 154 pts (77% idiopathic; median disease duration: 5.2 yrs; median [IQR] observation: 3.8 [1.4] yrs) analyzed, 59.7% (92/154) intensified treatment from NSAIDs ± colchicine to 2nd line therapy. 2nd line rilonacept significantly reduced ARR (0.086) versus prior NSAIDs ± colchicine (1.26), P<0.001, whereas 2nd line CS significantly increased ARR (3.04) versus prior NSAIDs ± colchicine (1.38), P=0.012; almost all recurrences on CS (94.1%) occurred while tapering. Outcomes from 2nd line rilonacept were significantly superior to 2nd line CS in both recurrence risk and HCRU (ARR: 0.086 vs. 3.04, P<0.001; hospitalizations: 0 vs. 14.5, P<0.001; ED visits: 0 vs. 43.4, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Real-world data from RESONANCE demonstrate that second-line IL-1 pathway inhibition with rilonacept provides superior clinical outcomes and reduced hospitalizations/ED visits versus corticosteroid-based management strategies. In pts failing NSAIDs/Colchicine, 2nd line rilonacept provided superior recurrence rate and disease burden reductions versus 2nd line CS, affirming the evidence-based corticosteroid-sparing paradigm shift recommended by the 2025 ACC CCG.

Keywords: autoinflammatory disease; interleukin‐1; recurrent pericarditis; rilonacept

Disclosures:P.C. Cremer: grants and consultant fees from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, grants and personal fees from Sobi; M. S. Garshick: consultant fees from BMS, Agepha, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals; S.A. Luis: consultant fees from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Cardiol Therapeutics, and Medtronic; A. Raisinghani: consultant fees from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals; B. Weber: consultant fees from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Horizon Therapeutics, and BMS; M. Al-Kazaz: research grant support from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ventyx, and Cardiol Therapeutics; speaking honoraria from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, and consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences; T. Hagerty: no relationships to disclose; J.R. Salik: no relationships to disclose; J.J. Ryan: research funding from Merck, Bayer, Liquidia, Janssen PH, Kiniksa, and served as a consultant for Merck, Liquidia, Janssen PH, United Therapeutics, and Kiniksa; T. Corey: no relationships to disclose; C. Grancorvitz, V. Parameswaran and J.F. Paolini: shareholders and employees of Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals; A.L. Klein: grants and consultant fees from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Cardiol Therapeutics, Ventyx, and Pfizer.