Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCSF

UC San Francisco Previously Published Works bannerUCSF

Predicting Soft Tissue Sarcoma Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using an MRI-Based Delta-Radiomics Approach

Published Web Location

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11307-023-01803-y
No data is associated with this publication.
Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of machine learning-augmented MRI-based radiomics models for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in soft tissue sarcomas.

Methods

Forty-four subjects were identified retrospectively from patients who received NAC at our institution for pathologically proven soft tissue sarcomas. Only subjects who had both a baseline MRI prior to initiating chemotherapy and a post-treatment scan at least 2 months after initiating chemotherapy and prior to surgical resection were included. 3D ROIs were used to delineate whole-tumor volumes on pre- and post-treatment scans, from which 1708 radiomics features were extracted. Delta-radiomics features were calculated by subtraction of baseline from post-treatment values and used to distinguish treatment response through univariate analyses as well as machine learning-augmented radiomics analyses.

Results

Though only 4.74% of variables overall reached significance at p ≤ 0.05 in univariate analyses, Laws Texture Energy (LTE)-derived metrics represented 46.04% of all such features reaching statistical significance. ROC analyses similarly failed to predict NAC response, with AUCs of 0.40 (95% CI 0.22-0.58) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.62) for RF and AdaBoost, respectively.

Conclusion

Overall, while our result was not able to separate NAC responders from non-responders, our analyses did identify a subset of LTE-derived metrics that show promise for further investigations. Future studies will likely benefit from larger sample size constructions so as to avoid the need for data filtering and feature selection techniques, which have the potential to significantly bias the machine learning procedures.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item