Background: There is a lack of research focusing exclusively on the sexual and reproductive healthcare of lesbian-identified Black women compared to studies with samples of heterosexual-identified and bisexual-identified Black women. Lesbian-identified Black women are likely to have different sexual and reproductive healthcare needs and concerns than heterosexual-identified Black women. An example of such needs includes the need for tailored safer sex options and education on alternative ways of achieving pregnancy, as well as other cultural considerations.Objectives: This dissertation sought to 1) examine and interpret how lesbian-identified Black women navigate accessing sexual and reproductive healthcare, 2) identify and interpret barriers and facilitators to accessing sexual and reproductive healthcare among lesbian-identified Black women, and 3) examine resiliency and protective factors employed by lesbian-identified Black women when navigating sexual and reproductive healthcare.Method: To accomplish these aims, a scoping literature review was conducted to synthesize the current literature on the sexual and reproductive healthcare experiences of lesbian-identified Black women. Using the theoretical frameworks of Intersectionality and Ecological Systems Theory, a qualitative interpretative phenomenological study was conducted to explore the lived experiences and meaning-making processes of lesbian-identified Black women. This study first examined and analyzed the origins of sexual and reproductive health experiences by positing the following research questions: 1) What were the experiences of lesbian-identified Black women during puberty, including menarche? 2) How do lesbian-identified Black women interpret their puberty experiences? And 3) In what ways do puberty experiences, including menarche, shape the way lesbian-identified Black women view and interact with sexual and reproductive healthcare in adulthood?The second analysis built upon how participants’ pubertal experiences affect and influence adult SRH practices and interactions. This part of the study aimed to answer the research questions: 1) What are the experiences of lesbian-identified Black women when experiencing pain or discomfort related to sexual and reproductive health conditions or disorders, such as fibroids, endometriosis, and general dysmenorrhea? 2) How do lesbian-identified Black women interpret their experiences with pain and discomfort related to sexual and reproductive conditions or disorders? 3) What are the facilitators and barriers for lesbian-identified Black women when seeking care for pain or discomfort related to sexual and reproductive conditions or disorders?Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 purposively sampled lesbian-identified Black women between January 2025 and September 2025. Two 60 to 120-minute interviews were conducted via Zoom, and video and audio recordings were made. The recordings were professionally transcribed verbatim and checked for accuracy. Data were managed via qualitative data analysis software ATLAS.ti, coded and analyzed using thematic and narrative analyses. The University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research approved the study (IRB #: 24-42513; Reference # 424569).Results: The scoping review identified 18 primary research studies published between 1988 and 2023 that examined lesbian-identified Black women’s sexual and reproductive healthcare experiences (Scott-Henderson, Franck, Asiodu, McLemore, et al., 2025). Key themes revealed the widespread influence of heteronormative assumptions by providers, barriers to lesbian-identified Black women disclosing sexual orientation, and deep-seated mistrust resulting from both racial and sexual orientation-based discrimination. Lesbian-identified Black women reported that these dynamics significantly obstructed their engagement with sexual and reproductive healthcare services, with many preferring Black, LGBTQ+-affirming providers and facilities. The findings also highlighted the underestimation of sexually transmitted infection risk and observed how insufficient provider knowledge contributes to gaps in care. Ultimately, the review illustrates how intersecting identities such as race, gender, and sexual orientation aggravate healthcare inequities, emphasizing the need for inclusive, culturally safe clinical environments and research frameworks.The findings of the first analysis presented thoughtful and reflective accounts of puberty experiences, including secondary sex characteristics and menarche. Participant narrative and reflective descriptions are captured under five themes: 1) “I wasn’t prepared:” Lack of Puberty Preparedness, 2) “I just figured it out on my own:” The Need for Self-study, 3) “Taboo:” Influence of Religion, 4) Influence of Sexuality/Gender Roles, and 5) Reproductive Challenges. The analysis presents overarching themes and narrative excerpts from the entire sample, illustrating the shared pubertal experiences of lesbian-identified Black women and aligning with the approach used by other interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) researchers.In the second analysis, through interviews, participants described long-standing challenges related to recognizing, managing, and seeking treatment for sexual and/or reproductive-related pain. Four significant barriers and three main facilitators emerged, each of which aligns with Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, and fell within the tenets of Intersectionality. At the macrosystem level, and aligned with the social inequality tenet of intersectionality, participants identified providers’ lack of LGBTQ+ knowledge as a key barrier, often resulting in inappropriate assumptions and inadequate care. Exosystem-level barriers that centered on navigating financial obstacles, including insurance coverage, medical bills, and fear of unexpected costs, were captured by the social inequality tenet of Intersectionality. Mesosystem-level barriers reflected cultural expectations of “thugging it out,” normalizing pain, and discouraging timely care-seeking, exemplifying the social context component of Intersectionality. Microsystem-level barriers included experiencing healthcare judgment, including being dismissed or stereotyped, and facing weight-related or identity-based bias, which exemplifies the social inequality element of Intersectionality.Conclusion: The current literature revealed a lack of studies exclusive to the personal sexual and reproductive healthcare experiences of lesbian-identified Black women and how these experiences affect their engagement in care. Although several studies applied intersectionality frameworks and include sizeable samples, important gaps remain in how lesbian-identified Black women’s sexual and reproductive health experiences are conceptualized and examined. Much of the existing literature focuses broadly on “Black sexual minority women,” resulting in limited disaggregation by sexual identity and an incomplete understanding of the specific experiences of lesbian-identified Black women.The first analysis highlights the complexity of pubertal experiences of lesbian-identified Black women and reveals ways in which lingering sexual and reproductive healthcare knowledge deficits, compounded by religious restrictions, shame, ridicule, and the adultification of Black girls’ pubescent bodies, stem from systemic issues that disproportionately affect minoritized populations, particularly Black women who identify as gay or lesbian. The second analysis examined current sexual and reproductive healthcare interactions by examining and identifying barriers and facilitators to lesbian-identified Black women seeking care for pain or discomfort related to sexual or reproductive conditions or disorders. Barriers identified include structural and cultural factors, such as Black women normalizing (“thugging out”) pain, being dismissed by healthcare providers, and experiencing discriminatory judgment in healthcare settings and encounters. Facilitators include convenient technological tools, increased self-advocacy related to job title or professional prestige, and access to safe spaces and social support networks. By focusing on inclusive provider training, leveraging technology, and strengthening support networks, obstacles to sexual and reproductive care and treatment can be overcome.Impacts and implications of this dissertation study include sexual and reproductive health resources targeting lesbian-identified Black women, early support and intervention for Black girls during puberty, inclusive and intersectional education and training for healthcare providers, leveraging the benefits of technology for increasing access to and autonomy in healthcare interactions, and increasing and strengthening social support networks for this population.