- Main
California Verbal Learning Test-II performance in schizophrenia as a function of ascertainment strategy: Comparing the first and second phases of the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS)
- Stone, William S;
- Mesholam-Gately, Raquelle I;
- Braff, David L;
- Calkins, Monica E;
- Freedman, Robert;
- Green, Michael F;
- Greenwood, Tiffany A;
- Gur, Raquel E;
- Gur, Ruben C;
- Lazzeroni, Laura C;
- Light, Gregory A;
- Nuechterlein, Keith H;
- Olincy, Ann;
- Radant, Allen D;
- Siever, Larry J;
- Silverman, Jeremy M;
- Sprock, Joyce;
- Sugar, Catherine A;
- Swerdlow, Neal R;
- Tsuang, Debby W;
- Tsuang, Ming T;
- Turetsky, Bruce I;
- Seidman, Larry J
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.029Abstract
The first phase of the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS-1) showed performance deficits in learning and memory on the California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II) in individuals with schizophrenia (SZ), compared to healthy comparison subjects (HCS). A question is whether the COGS-1 study, which used a family study design (i.e. studying relatively intact families), yielded "milder" SZ phenotypes than those acquired subsequently in the COGS-2 case-control design that did not recruit unaffected family members. CVLT-II performance was compared for the COGS-1 and COGS-2 samples. Analyses focused on learning, recall and recognition variables, with age, gender and education as covariates. Analyses of COGS-2 data explored effects of additional covariates and moderating factors in CVLT-II performance. 324 SZ subjects and 510 HCS had complete CVLT-II and covariate data in COGS-1, while 1356 SZ and 1036 HCS had complete data in COGS-2. Except for recognition memory, analysis of covariance showed significantly worse performance in COGS-2 on all CVLT-II variables for SZ and HCS, and remained significant in the presence of the covariates. Performance in each of the 5 learning trials differed significantly. However, effect sizes comparing cases and controls were comparable across the two studies. COGS-2 analyses confirmed SZ performance deficits despite effects of multiple significant covariates and moderating factors. CVLT-II performance was worse in COGS-2 than in COGS-1 for both the SZ and the HCS in this large cohort, likely due to cohort effects. Demographically corrected data yield a consistent pattern of performance across the two studies in SZ.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.