Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Procainamide vs Ibutilide in the Cardioversion of Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The data associated with this publication are not available for this reason: N/A
Abstract

Intravenous (IV) procainamide and ibutilide are two commonly used medications for the cardioversion of emergency department (ED) patients with recent onset (<48 hours) atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL;either = AF/AFL) across North America. It is unclear which medication is preferable. No trials have compared these agents for this indication and North American societyguidelines offer contradictory recommendations: procainamide is the drug of choice in the Canadian guideline, where ibutilide is not recommended; the converse is true in U.S. guidelines. Issues of effectiveness, safety, and ease of use may contribute to drug selection. Ibutilide carries a black-box warning for the risk for torsadede pointes (polymorphic ventricular tachycardia [VT]) and requires at least 4h of monitoring, making it riskier and more cumbersome to administer than procainamide.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View