Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Facilitators and barriers to implementation of Alberta family integrated care (FICare) in level II neonatal intensive care units: a qualitative process evaluation substudy of a multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial using the consolidated framework for implementation research
- Zanoni, Pilar;
- Scime, Natalie V;
- Benzies, Karen;
- McNeil, Deborah A;
- Mrklas, Kelly;
- Lodha, Abhay;
- Benzies, Karen M;
- Shah, Vibhuti;
- Aziz, Khalid;
- Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee;
- Scotland, Jeanne;
- Larocque, Jill;
- Mrklas, Kelly;
- Naugler, Christopher;
- Chari, Radha;
- Stelfox, Henry T;
- Amin, Harish;
- Hoch, Jeffrey;
- Soraisham, Amuchou;
- Walker-Kendall, Sandra;
- Akierman, Alberta;
- Phillipos, Ernest
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054938Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the barriers and facilitators to implementing Alberta Family Integrated Care (AB-FICare [2019 Benzies]), a model of care for integrating parents into level II neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) care teams, from the perspective of healthcare providers (HCP) and hospital administrators.Design
Qualitative process evaluation substudy.Setting
Ten level II NICUs in six cities across Alberta, Canada.Participants
HCP and hospital administrators (n=32) who were involved in the cluster-randomised controlled trial of AB-FICare in level II NICUs.Methods
Post-implementation semi-structured interviews were conducted via phone or in-person. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to develop interview guides, code transcripts and analyse data.Results
Key facilitators to implementation of AB-FICare included (1) a receptive implementation climate, (2) compatibility of the intervention with individual and organisational practices, (3) available resources and access to knowledge and information for HCP and hospital administrators, (4) engagement of key stakeholders across the organisation, (5) engagement of and outcomes for intervention participants, and (6) reflecting and evaluating on implementation progress and patient and family outcomes. Barriers were (1) design quality and packaging of the intervention, (2) relative priority of AB-FICare in relation to other initiatives, and (3) learning climate within the organisation. Mixed influences on implementation depending on contextual factors were coded to eight constructs: intervention source, cost, peer pressure, external policy and incentives, staff needs and resources, structural characteristics, organisational incentives and rewards, and knowledge, beliefs and attitudes.Conclusions
The characteristics of an organisation and the implementation process had largely positive influences, which can be leveraged for implementation of AB-FICare in the NICU. We recommend site-specific consultations to mitigate barriers and assess how swing factors might impact implementation given the local context, with the goal that strategies can be put in place to manage their influence on implementation.Trial registration number
NCT02879799.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%