Positive and negative affect has been associated with numerous health factors. However, what is commonly investigated are the mean levels of affect. While means reveal important information, how affect varies over time may provide further information about how the experience of affect relates to important outcomes. This change from moment to moment, day to day, or week to week has been referred to as affect variability and is often operationally defined as the standard deviation of affect over time. While useful, this methodology is incomplete as it loses important information about the temporal aspect of affect variability (i.e., information about patterns of affect responses over time are lost). Nevertheless, greater affect variability has been associated with several psychological health and health-relevant outcomes such as low self-esteem and higher depressive symptoms. What remains unclear is how affect variability patterns and interactions with mean levels relate to such variables. What is also unknown is whether affect variability is associated with markers of physical health. Therefore, the goals of this dissertation are to 1. assess whether affect variability is associated with markers of physical health, 2. examine a new method for assessing affect variability that may overcome the downsides of standard deviation (i.e., loss of information about patterns), and 3. use this new method to better understand how affect variability patterns relate to mental and physical health and health-relevant variables.
Objectives: The resource model of self-control posits that self-control is a finite resource that can be depleted. Individuals with diabetes must continually control their diet, requiring self-control. As a result, dietary adherence is difficult, and lapses are common. People with diabetes who overexert self-control, to gain control of their diet, following a lapse in adherence may be especially likely to experience a subsequent relapse, as suggested by the resource model. This investigation used the resource model of self-control to test whether overexertion of dietary self-control following a lapse would be predictive of a subsequent relapse in dietary control. Design: We tested this prediction in a longitudinal daily diary study of 128 individuals with diabetes (Mage = 66.12). Methods: Participants’ reports of their daily dietary adherence were used to define lapses in adherence, post-lapse adherence, and relapses. Results: Individuals who overexerted self-control after a lapse were more likely to experience a subsequent relapse (OR = 3.276, p = .016) and to do so sooner (HR = 2.12, p = .023). Conclusions: People with diabetes may seek to compensate for a lapse in adherence by overexerting self-control, but doing so may deplete their self-control and increase the risk of a future relapse.
Cookie SettingseScholarship uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience on our website. You can manage which cookies you want us to use.Our Privacy Statement includes more details on the cookies we use and how we protect your privacy.