Recently, bio-mediated and bio-inspired solutions in the field of geotechnical engineering havebeen proposed as sustainable alternatives to traditional, cement-intensive business-as-usual
technologies for infrastructure resiliency through geologic hazard mitigation. As these
biogeotechnologies develop, it is imperative that quantitative sustainability assessment, such
as life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), is employed to assess and guide their
sustainable development. This can ensure that they produce both technological and
sustainability advantages compared to traditional technologies considering social,
environmental, and economic impacts. This dissertation addresses these needs for improved
environmental assessment across biogeotechnologies by presenting a framework to evaluate
the environmental impacts and cost across the whole life cycle of a geologic hazard mitigation
project.
Chapter 1 introduces bio-mediated and bio-inspired geologic hazard mitigation techniques aspotentially sustainable alternatives to existing technologies and life cycle sustainability
assessment (LCSA) as a method to evaluate them. Chapter 2 then presents a systematic
literature review of emerging bio-mediated and bio-inspired ground improvement LCSA
studies, including those focused on enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP),
microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) and microbially induced desaturation and
precipitation (MIDP). The review demonstrates that environmental impacts such as global
warming and eutrophication are the most assessed and that inconsistencies in methodology
limit the application of the reviewed assessments.
Chapter 3 of this dissertation presents a framework for the evaluation of the environmentalimpacts and costs incurred across the whole life cycle of geotechnical earthquake mitigation
projects. This chapter also provides clear guidance for completion of a whole life cycle
assessment following the ISO 14040 and 14044 life cycle assessment standards. Permeation
grouting is evaluated as a liquefaction mitigation technique to provide an example
implementation of the proposed framework and guidance. This case study shows that the
construction stage of the permeation grouting project, specifically raw material supply for the
microfine cement grout, contributes greatly to the whole life cycle impacts. Site investigation
activities account for less than 1% of whole life cycle impacts suggesting that an increased
scope site investigation program could provide a better understanding of the subsurface,
reducing design uncertainties, without significantly impacting project sustainability.
Finally, a life cycle assessment of EICP columns for ground improvement is completed inChapter 4 to determine the environmental sustainability of EICP columns as compared to
permeation grouting. The study finds that EICP columns impacts are primarily due to calcium
chloride and urea production and transportation, with EICP biogeochemical process emissions
(i.e., ammonium production) accounting for the high eutrophication potential of EICP columns.
Other than when considering eutrophication potential, EICP columns present as a more
environmentally sustainable alternative to cement-based ground improvement.