- van den Berg, Leonard;
- Sorenson, Eric;
- Gronseth, Gary;
- Macklin, Eric;
- Andrews, Jinsy;
- Baloh, Robert;
- Benatar, Michael;
- Berry, James;
- Chio, Adriano;
- Corcia, Philippe;
- Genge, Angela;
- Gubitz, Amelie;
- Lomen-Hoerth, Catherine;
- McDermott, Christopher;
- Pioro, Erik;
- Rosenfeld, Jeffrey;
- Silani, Vincenzo;
- Turner, Martin;
- Weber, Markus;
- Brooks, Benjamin;
- Miller, Robert;
- Mitsumoto, Hiroshi
OBJECTIVE: To revise the 1999 Airlie House consensus guidelines for the design and implementation of preclinical therapeutic studies and clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: A consensus committee comprising 140 key members of the international ALS community (ALS researchers, clinicians, patient representatives, research funding representatives, industry, and regulatory agencies) addressed 9 areas of need within ALS research: (1) preclinical studies; (2) biological and phenotypic heterogeneity; (3) outcome measures; (4) disease-modifying and symptomatic interventions; (5) recruitment and retention; (6) biomarkers; (7) clinical trial phases; (8) beyond traditional trial designs; and (9) statistical considerations. Assigned to 1 of 8 sections, committee members generated a draft set of guidelines based on a background of developing a (pre)clinical question and a rationale outlining the evidence and expert opinion. Following a 2-day, face-to-face workshop at the Airlie House Conference Center, a modified Delphi process was used to develop draft consensus research guidelines, which were subsequently reviewed and modified based on comments from the public. Statistical experts drafted a separate document of statistical considerations (section 9). RESULTS: In this report, we summarize 112 guidelines and their associated backgrounds and rationales. The full list of guidelines, the statistical considerations, and a glossary of terms can be found in data available from Dryad (appendices e-3-e-5, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.32q9q5d). The authors prioritized 15 guidelines with the greatest potential to improve ALS clinical research. CONCLUSION: The revised Airlie House ALS Clinical Trials Consensus Guidelines should serve to improve clinical trial design and accelerate the development of effective treatments for patients with ALS.