Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Combinatorial Theory

Combinatorial Theory banner

Families with no perfect matchings

Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

We consider families of \(k\)-subsets of \(\{1, \dots, n\}\), where \(n\) is a multiple of \(k\), which have no perfect matching. An equivalent condition for a family \(\mathcal{F}\) to have no perfect matching is for there to be a blocking set, which is a set of \(b\) elements of \(\{1, \dots, n\}\) that cannot be covered by \(b\) disjoint sets in \(\mathcal{F}\). We are specifically interested in the largest possible size of a family \(\mathcal{F}\) with no perfect matching and no blocking set of size less than \(b\). Frankl resolved the case of families with no singleton blocking set (in other words, the \(b=2\) case) for sufficiently large \(n\) and conjectured an optimal construction for general \(b\). Though Frankl's construction fails to be optimal for \(k = 2, 3\), we show that the construction is optimal whenever \(k \ge 100\) and \(n\) is sufficiently large.

Mathematics Subject Classifications: 05D05