Wrong-Site Surgery in California, 2007-2014
- Author(s): Moshtaghi, O
- Haidar, YM
- Sahyouni, R
- Moshtaghi, A
- Ghavami, Y
- Lin, HW
- Djalilian, HR
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817693226
Objective The implementation of a universal surgical safety protocol in 2004 was intended to minimize the prevalence of wrong-site surgery (WSS). However, complete elimination of WSS in the operating room continues to be a challenge. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and etiology of WSS in the state of California. Study Design A retrospective study of all WSS reports investigated by the California Department of Public Health between 2007 and 2014. Methods Prevalence of overall and specialty-specific WSS, causative factors, and recommendations on further improvement are discussed. Results A total of 95 cases resulted in incident reports to the California Department of Public Health and were included in our study. The most common errors were operating on the wrong side of the patient's body (n = 60, 62%), performing the wrong procedure (n = 21, 21%), operating on the wrong body part (n = 12, 12%), and operating on the wrong patient (n = 2, 2%). WSS was most prevalent in orthopedic surgery (n = 33, 35%), followed by general surgery (n = 26, 27%) and neurosurgery (n = 16, 17%). All 3 otolaryngology WSS cases in California are associated with the ear. Conclusion WSS continues to surface despite national efforts to decrease its prevalence. Future research could establish best practices to avoid these "never events" in otolaryngology and other surgical specialties.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.