UCSF

OBJECTIVES: To test effects of an educational intervention on patient-reported outcomes among rural heart failure (HF) patients and to examine whether effects differed between patients with and without depression. METHODS: Patients (N = 614) were randomized to usual care (UC) or 1 of 2 intervention groups. Both intervention groups received face-to-face education, followed by either 2 phone calls (LITE) or biweekly calls until they demonstrated content competency (PLUS). Follow-up lasted 24 months. Statistical analyses included linear mixed models and subgroup analyses by depression status. RESULTS: Both intervention groups showed improvement in HF knowledge at 3 months (LITE-UC, p = 0.003; PLUS-UC, p < 0.001). Improvement lasted 24 months only in the PLUS group. Compared to UC, both intervention groups exhibited better self-care at 3 months (LITE-UC, p < 0.001; PLUS-UC, p < 0.001) and 12 months (LITE-UC, p = 0.001; PLUS-UC, p = 0.002). There were no differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among groups. In subgroup analyses, similar effects were found among non-depressed, but not among depressed patients. CONCLUSION: The educational intervention improved HF knowledge and self-care, but not HRQOL. No intervention effects were observed in patients with depressive symptoms. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The simple educational intervention is promising to improve HF knowledge and self-care. Additional strategies are needed for depressed patients.