UC Irvine

Recently described surgical approaches to the treatment of emphysema, including buttressed stapled volume reduction and laser coagulation, are associated with variable clinical outcomes. We examined objective preoperative factors as predictors of response to treatment in patients enrolled in a randomized trial of staple versus laser volume-reduction surgery in order to help define patient selection criteria for these procedures. Seventy-two patients with severe symptomatic emphysema without bullae were entered into the protocol (39 staple, 33 laser). Preoperative objective variables (pulmonary function tests, smoking history, demographics, and graded chest computed tomographic [CT] scans) were evaluated as predictors of response to treatment (defined as a change in FEV1) at 3- to 6-mo follow-up, using linear and multivariate regression analysis. Follow-up pulmonary function was obtained on 90% of the 68 patients surviving at 6 mo. Overall improvement was significant only for staple-treated patients, and improved outcome correlated with greater smoking history and younger age for staple-treated patients. When physiologic variables were analyzed, greater smoking history, lower DL(CO), and younger age predicted improved outcome for laser-treated patients. Preoperative FEV1 and gas-exchange variables did not predict outcome in staple-treated patients. When CT scan grading was included in multivariate regression analysis, hyperinflation (increased thoracic gas volume) was the primary predictor of response for laser-treated patients. These findings suggest that younger patients with evidence of advanced emphysematous lung disease and hyperinflation are optimal candidates for lung-volume-reduction surgery, particularly by staple-reduction techniques. Additional studies with long-term follow-up, bilateral procedures, and assessment of other outcome measures must be performed to further define operative criteria for lung-volume-reduction surgery for emphysema.