UCSF

Background

Women systematically experience lower rates of liver transplantation (LT) and higher rates of waitlist mortality than men. Self-rated health has been associated with patient outcomes in the global population. We, therefore, assessed gender differences in self-rated and clinician-rated health among LT candidates.

Methods

Ambulatory LT candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled from 2012 to 2018. Participants and their hepatologists were asked separately to rate the participant's overall general health on a 6-point scale (0="excellent" to 5="very poor"). Logistic regression was used to assess the associations between covariates and superior self-assessment, defined as 1 SD above the mean self-assessment score.

Results

Of 855 participants, the median (interquartile range) self-rated health score was 2 (1-3); 156 (18%) were categorized as superior self-rated health. The correlation between self-rated and clinician-rated health was positive (Spearman's rho 0.3, P<0.001). In univariate analysis, being a woman was associated with lower odds of superior self-rated health (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0, P=0.04), which persisted on multivariable analysis (aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.0, P=0.05), controlling for race, frailty, work status, comorbidities, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Na, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the need for well-designed quality-based research to determine how our patients perceive health to highlight opportunities to offer more comprehensive, quality-based care.