UC Santa Cruz

When the barotropic tide encounters variable bathymetry, fluctuating flow along a topographic slope generates baroclinic tides, or internal tides. There is growing evidence that these internal tides can affect primary production in the euphotic zone, though the dominant mechanisms are unclear. Internal tides move passive phytoplankton through an exponentially varying light field, enhancing primary production near the base of the euphotic zone. In addition internal tides also increase primary production through vertical nutrient advection into the euphotic zone. Topographically generated internal tides can be separated into two regimes: 1) the often highly nonlinear near-field regime where tidal beams are observed and 2) the more linear far-field regime. This study examines the primary production response to these internal tide processes using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) coupled to a simple Nutrient, Phytoplankton, Zooplankton, Detritus (NPZD) model configured for an oligotrophic system with the nutricline positioned below 50 m depth. These idealized simulations generate internal tide beams with an oscillating, horizontal body force at the M2 tidal frequency that is applied to domains with a bathymetric step and uniform stratification. Sensitivity of the primary production response to the energy content of the tidal beam is obtained by adjusting the height and slope of the bathymetric step. Simulation results reveal that primary production intensifies along tidal beams due to the local enhancement of parcel vertical displacement (light effect) and nutrient advective flux divergence (nutrient effect). In the near-field regime across the range of step heights and slopes in this study, the nutrient effect is an order of magnitude larger and explains 92% of the variance in primary production versus only 14% for the light effect. The geometry of the generating feature sets the kinematics of the tidal beam. The light effect is limited in the euphotic zone across our domains because realized changes in light experienced over a tidal cycle are small relative to the amount of light available at a particular depth. In contrast, the magnitude of the nutrient effect increases more substantially with tidal beam energy.