Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCSF

UC San Francisco Previously Published Works bannerUCSF

Cross-cultural adaptation of motivational interviewing for use in rural Nepal.

  • Author(s): Rimal, Pragya;
  • Khadka, Sonu;
  • Bogati, Bhawana;
  • Chaudhury, Jamuna;
  • Rawat, Laxmi Kumari;
  • Bhat, Kumari Chhaya;
  • Manandhar, Pramita;
  • Citrin, David;
  • Maru, Duncan;
  • Ekstrand, Maria L;
  • Swar, Sikhar Bahadur;
  • Aryal, Anu;
  • Kohrt, Brandon;
  • Shrestha, Srijana;
  • Acharya, Bibhav
  • et al.
Abstract

Background

Motivational Interviewing (MI) has a robust evidence base in facilitating behavior change for several health conditions. MI focuses on the individual and assumes patient autonomy. Cross-cultural adaptation can face several challenges in settings where individualism and autonomy may not be as prominent. Sociocultural factors such as gender, class, caste hinder individual decision-making. Key informant perspectives are an essential aspect of cross-cultural adaptation of new interventions. Here, we share our experience of translating and adapting MI concepts to the local language and culture in rural Nepal, where families and communities play a central role in influencing a person's behaviors.

Methods

We developed, translated, field-tested, and adapted a Nepali MI training module with key informants to generate insights on adapting MI for the first time in this cultural setting. Key informants were five Nepali nurses who supervise community health workers. We used structured observation notes to describe challenges and experiences in cross-cultural adaptation. We conducted this study as part of a larger study on using MI to improve adherence to HIV treatment.

Results

Participants viewed MI as an effective intervention with the potential to assist patients poorly engaged in care. Regarding patient autonomy, they initially shared examples of family members unsuccessfully dictating patient behavior change. These discussions led to consensus that every time the family members restrict patient's autonomy, the patient complies temporarily but then resumes their unhealthy behavior. In addition, participants highlighted that even when a patient is motivated to change (e.g., return for follow-up), their family members may not "allow" it. Discussion led to suggestions that health workers may need to conduct MI separately with patients and family members to understand everyone's motivations and align those with the patient's needs.

Conclusions

MI carries several cultural assumptions, particularly around individual freedom and autonomy. MI adaptation thus faces challenges in cultures where such assumptions may not hold. However, cross-cultural adaptation with key informant perspectives can lead to creative strategies that recognize both the patient's autonomy and their role as a member of a complex social fabric to facilitate behavior change.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View